Re: Wanna talk about Class?
flushd wrote:
To start with - what are your general experiences with class systems where you have grown and lived?
Grew up running from rental to rental, on food stamps for a while, until my parents got their business going a little bit and they bought a doublewide trailer in an isolated area with no children and cut off from the world by a busy country highway where you had to have a car to get anywhere.
There and elsewhere I've never felt like I fit in a "class," though once I left home I've been very aware of them. Accidents of history have terrible effects on people's lives, and I am eternally grateful that I had the good fortune not to have been born into worse circumstances. Many of the people before me lived in terrible circumstances.
flushd wrote:
Do you consider yourself to belong to specific class and what is it?
Is it the one you were born into?
A big part of me will never be anything but what I was when I grew up: a hillbilly kid with no television, great weather, and lots of room to roam. At the same time, my folks placed a huge value on my learning stuff, so I'm oddly educated and a big geek, so I find it difficult to relate to ambitious people because no one ever had a lot of material ambition (like most everyone around me) and to people who aren't, like, interested in weird stuff. (Even when my folks later got money and spent it it was listlessly, with no intelligence or forethought or real zeal.)
Most people I'm around have some sort of material ambition, some of them a lot of it.
flushd wrote:Do you believe that a classless society is possible?
No. You might get a false positive on that by relying on some familiar and limited definition of class, but I doubt there is any group of people who feel that their interaction with the group of people who influence their lives is without any sort of power-based interaction.
Lobotomized chimpanzees gravitate toward each other, even when trained observers can't tell them from the nonlobotomized ones. Similarly, the ambitious will always form groups to pick on the unambitious -- or, sometimes, the differently ambitious, if resources are limited (and they always are, somehow, and the distribution of luck usually favors one bunch over another). The unambitious will similarly continue to find ways to discriminate amongst ourselves.
Was that a dire pronouncement? Don't worry, I don't have any references.