1
   

Over Half of Tsunami Aid Unspent

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Wed 20 Dec, 2006 07:15 am
You should be very wary of where you make charitable contributions. As I've said many times before, the world is full of cheats and posers.



About half of the billions of dollars donated by individuals, companies and governments worldwide to help the victims of the southeast Asian tsunami two years ago has still not been spent, the BBC said.
According to figures obtained by the broadcaster from a database compiled by the United Nations Department for Aid and Development, several foreign governments have also only given only a small proportion, and at times none, of the money they promised.



Of the 6.7 billion dollars (5.1 billion euros) pledged, about a tenth has yet to be delivered, and only 3.4 billion dollars has been spent thus far, the BBC said.

Among the countries that came up with a fraction of what they promised, China offered 301 million dollars to help Sri Lanka recover from the disaster, but has thus far delivered just one million dollars, the broadcaster said.

Spain pledged 60 million dollars to Sri Lanka, but came up with less than a million, while France said it would give 79 million dollars, but delivered just over a million dollars.

Kuwait had pledged slightly less than 10 million dollars to the Maldives, but has yet to actually hand over any money.

The United States has given about 38 percent of the money it promised, according to the UN figures. The European Commission owes about 70 million dollars, and Britain 12 million.

The broadcaster said on its website that about nine percent of the total money pledged was not yet delivered.


The BBC said that of the 2.2 billion dollars donated to the Red Cross worldwide in the aftermath of the disaster, about 1.3 billion dollars had not yet been spent, and of the 50,000 homes promised by the Red Cross, just 8,000 had been finished.

Speaking to the BBC, the international director for the British Red Cross defended its performance: "It sounds bad, but I think it needs to be put into context."

"It is incredibly difficult ... we said from the beginning, this is happening in very difficult circumstances. We raised the money knowing it was difficult. It will take time to spend this money in a responsible manner," Matthias Schmale said.

He said that the British Red Cross had thus far finished 16 of the 2,000 homes it had promised, with 265 ready to be handed over, and a further 400 would have their foundation laid by the end of this month.

"I know this sounds like slow progress ... When the tsunami swept away houses, it also swept away identity papers, legal plot papers, etc. We have taken almost a year to help people back ... to make sure they have legal ownership of their plots," he said.

The UN's special rapporteur on adequate housing Miloon Kothari was unimpressed by the reasons for delays in building housing, telling the BBC: "It should really not take this long to build permanent housing.

"I do not accept the explanation that it is going to take four to five years, in some cases, seven. I'm an architect, I know how long it takes to build a house."

Early on December 26, 2004, a magnitude 9.3 earthquake off the Indonesian island of Sumatra triggered an ocean-wide tsunami that killed 220,000 people.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 433 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Dec, 2006 07:52 am
Quote:
The BBC said that of the 2.2 billion dollars donated to the Red Cross worldwide in the aftermath of the disaster, about 1.3 billion dollars had not yet been spent, and of the 50,000 homes promised by the Red Cross, just 8,000 had been finished.



Exactly why, at the time, people were urging folks not to donate to the Red Cross/Red Crescent, but to donate to organizations such as Oxfam and World Vision. It was known at the time that most money donated to the Red Cross would be very slow in getting to the people who needed it and not all of the pledged aid money would actually be paid by the various governments.

Got any disbursement statistics for Oxfam? It'd be interesting to compare. I'll also take a look and see if I can find any.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Dec, 2006 08:23 am
No, I wasn't really doing an analysis, just cut and pasting. Never heard of either of those orgs but that "World Vision" sounds like a progressive leaning bunch. "We'll give you aid but only if you give up all your weapons and stop hunting and fishing and reduce your red meat consumption". Wink
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Over Half of Tsunami Aid Unspent
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 07:08:43