0
   

Location, primo Architect, Chain store - a No.

 
 
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 12:43 am
Interesting decision from planning department -

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,5-2502081.html




The Times December 14, 2006

Non, H&M, you may not open up on the Champs Elysées
Adam Sage in Paris
Paris throws out retailer's store plan
Too many clothes, not enough culture

H&M, the retail group, has been told that it cannot open a €50 million (£37 million) flagship store on the Champs Elysées in Paris because there are already too many clothes shops on the avenue.
The Swedish chain's application for a 2,800 sq m store on Europe's most expensive thoroughfare was rejected by the Paris Commercial Planning Committee. Opponents of the plan said that the avenue needed fewer cheap garments and more culture.

"There is a risk that the Champs Elysées could become banal," Lynne Cohen-Solal, head of planning at Paris's city council, said. "We have nothing against H&M." Nevertheless, she pointed out that clothes occupied 39 per cent of the retail space on the avenue, which was "the maximum".

"We want to maintain a variety of culture, restaurants and shopping," she said. "It's important to us that the cinemas and the cafés remain. Oxford Street is a bit the example of what we want to avoid."

The decision is a setback for H&M, which had asked Jean Nouvel, the celebrated French architect, to design its store.

Although it has nine stores in Paris and 85 in France, its absence from the Champs Elysées the showcase of the French retail trade, is seen as a handicap. Gap and Zara, its main rivals, have shops there.

H&M is understood to be considering an appeal against the planning ruling, which undermines a central part of its strategy in France. H&M France declined to comment yesterday.

Retail analysts say the Champs Elysées is a prize location not only because it attracts half a million people a day ?- 850,000 on Saturdays ?- but also because of its symbolic value. "When you go there, you aim well beyond the French market," Emmanuelle Gaye, spokeswoman for Adidas, whose biggest store opened there in October, said.

Although the Champs Elysées is the third most expensive street in the world for retailers ?- behind Fifth Avenue, New York, and Causeway Bay, Hong Kong, and ahead of New Bond Street in London ?- most chains say that the price is worth paying. They say that stores on les Champs ?- where the average monthly rent has risen from €6,287 per square metre in 2004 to €6,775 ?- generate bigger sales than those anywhere else in France.

Created in 1640 by André Le Nôtre, the landscape gardener, the avenue was widely seen as down-at-heel in the 1980s before Jacques Chirac ordered an overhaul when he was Mayor of Paris. It has since developed a split personality. Retail chains have swarmed to the sunny, north side, which attracts more pedestrians, while luxury goods groups have gone to the south side. A year ago Louis Vuitton invited Uma Thurman and Sharon Stone to re-open its renovated south-side shop, where its monogrammed bags sell for several hundred euros each.

However, Bertrand Delanoë, the Mayor of Paris, has ordered a "mobilisation plan" to prevent restaurants and cinemas from being squeezed out by the likes of Gap and Guerlain.

Dominique Rodet, who represents businesses with premises on the avenue, backed him.

"Parisians come here for the cinemas," she said. "If there are none left, people won't hang around any more."

Rents league

The world's most expensive streets, per square foot, for retailers:

Fifth Avenue
New York ?- $1,350

Causeway Bay
Hong Kong ?- $1,134

Champs Elysées
Paris ?- $805

New Bond Street
London ?- $673

Ginza
Tokyo ?- $652

Grafton Street
Dublin ?- $534

Source: Cushman & Wakefield



Hey, finally culture over rules money.

What do you want to bet the Planner loses her job one of these days.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,234 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 02:02 am
Actually, that's the way many planning departments in may (European) town and cities do their job :wink:
0 Replies
 
Tico
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 07:23 am
It's unfortunate for H&M, especially when their competitors are there. (I wish the article had a picture of Nouvel's proposal.) It's possible that the planning department is exercising prejudice, but maybe not. There is a common-enough cycle in urban development where a seedy locale becomes artsy and then trendy, landlords hike the rents, the big retailers come in and shoulder out the small shops. Without services and restaurants, the area becomes very sensitive to the slightest shift in economics. One large retailer decides that the cost of rent/staffing is not worth it and starts a domino effect, with all the other retailers leaving as well. But now the architecture of the big boxes is non-conducive to the revivifying small retailer, and so the area becomes worse than it started. Good planning can prevent this, no?

The better shopping centres, which I am more familiar with than urban planning, have whole departments dedicated to finding the right mix and deciding adjacencies (who will be next to whom) -- all with the aim of creating a lively, regenerating community.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 09:04 am
The reason - given by the CDEC (Commission départementale de l'environnement commercial) - is that there are already 39% of all shops on the Champs selling clothes/clothing and nine greater shops occupy already 13.900 m².
That is thought too be plenty for Paris.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 10:02 am
"Banal" makes sense. H & M is a cool chain store and everything, but it's a chain store. I'd hate to see the Champs Elysées mallified.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 10:05 am
H&M might be cool for under-30's, I think. :wink:

I'm glad that they finally stopped changing the character of the Champs .... and has taken quite some time until that was realised.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 11:29 am
I'm glad about the decision. I like a good planning department (some, in my opinion, have been benighted, some times.) My saying it is an interesting decision - since money often rules, and this is a case of money and building style - was a touch of admiration.

Wise planning can happen in the US; certain structures are not allowed along x corridors, and various kinds of zoning are sometimes a good thing (sometimes not). Some design review boards have savvy like this planner.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Dec, 2006 11:41 am
I'll add that in the best scenario there would have been a policy established before the other Chains built there. This is now a bit of the horse following behind the cart. Still I'm glad for the decision.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 12:22 am
A big report about this in today's Guardian:

http://i16.tinypic.com/2zf33o0.jpg

Report online: Champs Elysées 'declining into Oxford Street'
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 12:36 am
Joe Dassin? relative of Jules???


Well, from my pov, a city has a right - if established early- to choose anything, along its main streets.


Do I really think that, I dunno. I'm theoretically a person of license as a city planner, though I haven't worked in a planning department (have done some city planning design.)

One wants to be a pope here, a Sixtus who did the Rome goosefoot, for better or worse.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Location, primo Architect, Chain store - a No.
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/28/2026 at 11:22:11