Bill O'Reilly on the Oprah Winfrey Show

I saw a piece of that as I was getting a cup of tea at work.

He seems to think that Americans, as a group, are remarkably stupid. I was surprised to hear him express such an opinion of his viewers/readers/whatevers.

Oh yeah.. its the fault of the left wing.

Tell us again who is fighting the teaching of evolution in schools? I don't think it is the left wing.

The conservatives must be really smart if they can be in control of this country for 6 years and everything is still the fault of the left wing.

[

Fox News listeners know both sides of the issues not only the side the "special interest" groups want them to know.

This makes them more capable of deciding the issues "correctly".

This is why Fox News is watched more than any other news channel and this is why Bill O'Reilly is No. 1.

RexRed wrote:

[

Fox News listeners know both sides of the issues not only the side the "special interest" groups want them to know.

This makes them more capable of deciding the issues "correctly".

This is why Fox News is watched more than any other news channel and this is why Bill O'Reilly is No. 1.

Yes, and we are winning in Iraq.

I saw a piece of that as I was getting a cup of tea at work.

He seems to think that Americans, as a group, are remarkably stupid. I was surprised to hear him express such an opinion of his viewers/readers/whatevers.

parados wrote:

Oh yeah.. its the fault of the left wing.

Tell us again who is fighting the teaching of evolution in schools? I don't think it is the left wing.

The conservatives must be really smart if they can be in control of this country for 6 years and everything is still the fault of the left wing.

Evolution has been taught in schools for over forty years... (that I know of)

So who is fighting creation being taught in schools???

For example, in the book of Joshua, we are told, the sun stood still several hours. Were we to read that fact in Livy or Tacitus, we should class it with their showers of blood, speaking of statues, beasts, etc. But it is said, that the writer of that book was inspired. Examine, therefore, candidly, what evidence there is of his having been inspired. The pretension is entitled to your inquiry, because millions believe it. On the other hand, you are astronomer enough to know how contrary it is to the law of nature that a body revolving on its axis, as the earth does, should have stopped, should not, by that sudden stoppage, have prostrated animals, trees, buildings, and should after a certain time gave resumed its revolution, and that without a second general prostration. Is this arrest of the earth's motion, or the evidence which affirms it, most within the law of probabilities?

You have never seen the Northern lights, have you Rex?

Look at the photo you posted and see all the stars visible. Now tell me how many stars you see that close to the sun.

You continue to prove that it isn't the liberals that are uninformed.

OMG...

That has to be the funniest thing I have heard yet, the northern lights are "sun flairs" [sic]? Too too funny.

http://www.northern-lights.no/english/what/cause.shtml