1
   

Neural networks and computer simulation

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Sun 24 Sep, 2006 06:57 am
Neural networks and computer simulation

Computers are used to simulate hurricanes for the purpose of comprehending hurricanes and also for the purpose of predicting their behavior. Computers are often used to simulate various phenomena for similar purposes.

In the effort to utilize computers as controllers for robotics and to simulate human cognition we have developed a great deal of empirical evidence concerning human functioning. The software engineers must develop detailed comprehension of bodies in motion and intellects in action in order to write the algorithms required to build robots of all forms whether to simulate human intellect or human motion.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) research began shortly after WWII. Alan Turing was one of the important figures who decided that their efforts would not be focused on building machines but in programming computers.

Some of the achievements of AI have, in the last few decades, been turned toward neural modeling. This effort has been taken up by NTL (Neural Theory of Language) research group at Berkeley headed by Jerome Feldman and George Lakoff.

The brain's neural network does things and the task the NTL has set for itself in the 1990s was to discover how the brain does what it does and where in the brain these tasks take place. As of 1999 NTL had decided to undertake three major modeling tasks:
1) The Spatial-Relations Learning Task
2) The Verbs of Hand Motion Learning task
3) The Motor Control and Abstract Aspectual Reasoning Task

"In each case, it has been shown that neural structures modeling aspects of the perceptual and motor systems can carry out the given task for concepts, and that, so far as anyone cal tell thus far, those perceptual and motor models are required to carry out the task."

That is to say that the sensorimotor system in the human body can perform the functions required to conceptualize and, infer from those conceptions, in a manner required by human cognition. The logical assumption is that these self same sensorimotor neural networks are the networks the body uses to conceptualize during cognition.

Quotes from "Philosophy in The Flesh" by Lakoff and Johnson
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 385 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Sep, 2006 09:51 am
Neural networks have the full power of turing machines. That is to say that it is possible to construct a machine using neural connections to do anything that a computer could do. But that doesn't say much about how the human neural network is made. That's like saying "matter can be used to construct any shape" and "my hand is made out of matter." That doesn't mean my hand can assume any shape. Everyone knows that the body is controlled by the nervous system aka neural networks. That doesn't mean we understand cognition!
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:01 am
That is to say that the sensorimotor system in the human body can perform the functions required to conceptualize and, infer from those conceptions, in a manner required by human cognition. The logical assumption is that these self same sensorimotor neural networks are the networks the body uses to conceptualize during cognition.

The above paragraph that I have copied from the OP contains the really important conclusions upon which the new cognitive science paradigm is based.


We have in our Western philosophy a traditional theory of faculty psychology wherein our reasoning is a faculty completely separate from the body. "Reason is seen as independent of perception and bodily movement." It is this capacity of autonomous reason that makes us different in kind from all other animals. I suspect that many fundamental aspects of philosophy and psychology are focused upon declaring, whenever possible, the separateness of our species from all other animals.

This tradition of an autonomous reason began long before evolutionary theory and has held strongly since then without consideration, it seems to me, of the theories of Darwin and of biological science. Cognitive science has in the last three decades developed considerable empirical evidence supporting Darwin and not supporting the traditional theories of philosophy and psychology regarding the autonomy of reason. Cognitive science has focused a great deal of empirical science toward discovering the nature of the embodied mind.

The three major findings of cognitive science are:
The mind is inherently embodied.
Thought is mostly unconscious.
Abstract concepts are largely metaphorical.

"These findings of cognitive science are profoundly disquieting [for traditional thinking] in two respects. First, they tell us that human reason is a form of animal reason, a reason inextricably tied to our bodies and the peculiarities of our brains. Second, these results tell us that our bodies, brains, and interactions with our environment provide the mostly unconscious basis for our everyday metaphysics, that is, our sense of what is real."
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 07:14 am
Oh, ok. Well keep at it...I wonder how long it will take them to prove that the world is not flat.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Neural networks and computer simulation
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 07:30:53