0
   

Does omnipotence necessitate omniscience?

 
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 09:48 am
If God is both omnipotent and omniscient, we would be forced to conclude that all the evil and human suffering that now exists must have at one time existed only in the mind of God and that he deliberately unleashed these abominations on his intelligent creation in an act of celestial sadism.

How then do we account for the qualities of love, justice and mercy we as humans are wont to display from time to time? Assuming the existence of God, could the creation surpass the creator in these attributes?
0 Replies
 
duce
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:00 am
Quote:
One cannot be omnipotent if one is not also omniscient, and therein lies the paradox.


Thank you, I finally get it!
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:02 am
neologist wrote:
If God is both omnipotent and omniscient, we would be forced to conclude that all the evil and human suffering that now exists must have at one time existed only in the mind of God and that he deliberately unleashed these abominations on his intelligent creation in an act of celestial sadism.

How then do we account for the qualities of love, justice and mercy we as humans are wont to display from time to time? Assuming the existence of God, could the creation surpass the creator in these attributes?


Let's make the problem simple; let's NOT assume the existence of God. And watch all the hand-wringing and self-loathing and whining vanish.

But, if you want to explore the problem assuming the existence of God, just as an academic exercise, well, that's different. Then I guess we would be forced to conclude that the world is the way is it because god intended it to be that way (full of good stuff and bad stuff).
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:04 am
neologist wrote:
If God is both omnipotent and omniscient, we would be forced to conclude that all the evil and human suffering that now exists must have at one time existed only in the mind of God and that he deliberately unleashed these abominations on his intelligent creation in an act of celestial sadism.


Bingo ! ! !

Somebody give that boy a cee-gar . . .

Quote:
How then do we account for the qualities of love, justice and mercy we as humans are wont to display from time to time? Assuming the existence of God, could the creation surpass the creator in these attributes?


One very simple explanation is to discard the assumption of archaic, puerile creator based upon the model of a nomadic patriarch in the middle east thousands of years ago.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:06 am
duce wrote:
Quote:
One cannot be omnipotent if one is not also omniscient, and therein lies the paradox.


Thank you, I finally get it!
One cannot have two truths in contradiction. Therefore, one who is omnipotent must have the ability to choose the things he will know. Omniscience would be a matter of choice.
0 Replies
 
Scott777ab
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:11 am
Re: Does omnipotence necessitate omniscience?
rosborne979 wrote:
neologist wrote:
Must an all powerful God necessarily know the outcome of all his works?


Yes. Omnipotence necessitates Omniscience (IMO).

neologist wrote:
Or is he free to use his power of foreknowledge selectively?


You cannot "select" to be impotent, and still be omnipotent.

The condition you suggest would be a paradox.


Maybe God is just that a PARADOX. Everything about his existence being a PARADOX. Intresting thought actually. God is a paradox I will have to think on that some that is very intresting.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:11 am
So basic thesis, then, Neo, is that your god always wants what's best for us, but exercises selective foreknowledge so as to allow us free will (which inferentially suggests that if your god knew we would transgress, he would be obliged to interfere--leaving you with more problems about what omnipotence means). Then, when we transgress due to our perversity and the exercise of free will, this omnipotent, and loving, compassionate diety forgives us, and takes us to his bossom--of course, so that we can sing the silly old ego-maniacs praises for eternity.

Pretty damned thin, Boss, you're asking reasonable people to swallow a lot . . .
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:15 am
Forgiveness is not automatic, Set. Though it is freely given.

But you at least are one of the few who get what I am trying to say.
0 Replies
 
Scott777ab
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:16 am
neologist wrote:
duce wrote:
Quote:
One cannot be omnipotent if one is not also omniscient, and therein lies the paradox.


Thank you, I finally get it!
One cannot have two truths in contradiction. Therefore, one who is omnipotent must have the ability to choose the things he will know. Omniscience would be a matter of choice.


Well you guys are all missing the THREE traits applied to God.

Omnipotent = All Powerful - you got this one
Omniscience = All Knowing - you got this one
Omnipresence = Ever Present Or Present Everywhere - you missed this one.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:18 am
neologist wrote:
Forgiveness is not automatic, Set. Though it is freely given.

But you at least are one of the few who get what I am trying to say.


Yes, and i don't agree with a jot or tittle of it--as you well know.

(Pssst . . . that joker Scott has started to hang around--he likes to pummel Jehovah's witnesses [and Catholics] whenever he can, keep your eyes peeled.)
0 Replies
 
duce
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:19 am
or one could open his mind to the possibility that we do not know everything God knows.

Jesse Duplantis said he asked God How 1/3 of heaven could be fooled an follow Lucifer. God told Jessie "that's easy, I taught him everything he knows" Jessie said "Do What now?" God said "He was of the highest rank he sought me and my power, I showed him a few tricks I had not shown the other angels, he wanted my power and he wanted to be worshiped. He thought I had showed him everything I know, but I had not--he went and showed some of the others the tricks and they were fooled and said oh wow, we never saw God do stuff like that, so Lucifer must have more power than God and they followed him. So listen carefully Jesse, I said I taught him everything he knows, not everything I know."

Just a thought..There are just to many gaps in evolution and science alone for me not to believe in a creator, then there are the testimonies of miracles, my own experience and well just stuff you atheists have given up on.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:25 am
Setanta wrote:
neologist wrote:
Forgiveness is not automatic, Set. Though it is freely given.

But you at least are one of the few who get what I am trying to say.


Yes, and i don't agree with a jot or tittle of it--as you well know.

(Pssst . . . that joker Scott has started to hang around--he likes to pummel Jehovah's witnesses [and Catholics] whenever he can, keep your eyes peeled.)
Uh Oh; thanks, Set. I owe ya.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 10:26 am
duce wrote:
or one could open his mind to the possibility that we do not know everything God knows.

Jesse Duplantis said he asked God How 1/3 of heaven could be fooled an follow Lucifer. God told Jessie "that's easy, I taught him everything he knows" Jessie said "Do What now?" God said "He was of the highest rank he sought me and my power, I showed him a few tricks I had not shown the other angels, he wanted my power and he wanted to be worshiped. He thought I had showed him everything I know, but I had not--he went and showed some of the others the tricks and they were fooled and said oh wow, we never saw God do stuff like that, so Lucifer must have more power than God and they followed him. So listen carefully Jesse, I said I taught him everything he knows, not everything I know."

Just a thought..There are just to many gaps in evolution and science alone for me not to believe in a creator, then there are the testimonies of miracles, my own experience and well just stuff you atheists have given up on.
The angels who rebelled were not fooled, duce.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2006 08:03 pm
duce wrote:

Just a thought..There are just to many gaps in evolution and science alone for me not to believe in a creator, then there are the testimonies of miracles, my own experience and well just stuff you atheists have given up on.


or put another way.....I'd prefer to ignore the vast amounts of data and the obvious natural reality... if there is the slightest chance I can cling to my wonderful comforting magical fantasy (for which there is zero factual evidence)...... but I just want it to be true soooo very much, so I believe !!!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 08:25 am
neologist wrote:
The angels who rebelled were not fooled, duce.


With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone . . .

Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 08:33 am
Setanta wrote:
neologist wrote:
The angels who rebelled were not fooled, duce.


With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone . . .

Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Interesting passage, Set.
Is that or your origination?
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 02:24 pm
Setanta wrote:
neologist wrote:
The angels who rebelled were not fooled, duce.


With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone . . .

Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again


'Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Meet the new boss Same as the old boss...

Cool boss


Cool
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2013 08:28 pm
@Scott777ab,
neologist wrote:
duce wrote:
Quote:
One cannot be omnipotent if one is not also omniscient, and therein lies the paradox.


Thank you, I finally get it!
One cannot have two truths in contradiction. Therefore, one who is omnipotent must have the ability to choose the things he will know. Omniscience would be a matter of choice.
Scott777ab wrote:
Well you guys are all missing the THREE traits applied to God.Omnipotent = All Powerful - you got this one
OK
Scott777ab wrote:
Omniscience = All Knowing - you got this one
Not hardly
Scott777ab wrote:
Omnipresence = Ever Present Or Present Everywhere - you missed this one.
Not true. He does not need to be physically present to know what is gong on. Does Higgs Boson explain this? Maybe. I won't try to say.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 02:32:27