Re: #75
chiefcw wrote:Does anyone have this for #75 ?
Code:http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/NN/hrn39.html
This is the first I've seen of it.
#80
The mountains for #80 have a more formal name, does anyone think the formal answer is what Marlboro wants?
r u refering to the spanish name? i think that is what they want.
I too wrote down the spanish name.
#74
Yup, thats what I was getting at. How about #74, I think 13 is correct, here's why:
http://www.colorado.com/article172
Chief,
Nope thats not what i got keep digging!!!
44 anyone???
rats forgot to put 75 in there for my response sorry
...your on the right track with it though!
Re: #74
I've also read this site, and many more. My final decision is based on a newspaper article I found. I was searching the markers in google images and it lead me to a newspaper site referring to the newest marker and it has pictures of everything, along with the full history of the issue. I'm going with 13.
13, 15, 18???? thought i had this one a long time ago. grrrr. nothing on 44 yet sorry. think i got 2 more answers today. still stuck on 40, 44, and 75.
brainfart, i'm confused 75 for what?
Toots that was in response to chiefs answer for 75, go back a pge you see his link.
brainfart wrote:Toots that was in response to chiefs answer for 75, go back a pge you see his link.
If you said Chief was on the right track with Nameless, Tx... I think I know what you are getting at, and I was thinking the same thing.
angel it fits no???.nice to know someone else found it too!!!
#77
On #77 I had read somewhere that there was a bogus site out there saying the cowboy was in Denver when in fact it is supposed to be in Pueblo. I can only find him in Denver, anyone find something different?
brainfart wrote: angel it fits no???.nice to know someone else found it too!!!
yeah, pretty well actually... it just doesn't write out wonder for you.
Re: #77
chiefcw wrote:On #77 I had read somewhere that there was a bogus site out there saying the cowboy was in Denver when in fact it is supposed to be in Pueblo. I can only find him in Denver, anyone find something different?
I saw the same thing, it was a lady saying she was looking it up for her daughter or something... well, I think she was trying to mislead people. I have a friend in denver and I called her and asked, she said it is indeed in Denver.
Re: #77
chiefcw wrote:On #77 I had read somewhere that there was a bogus site out there saying the cowboy was in Denver when in fact it is supposed to be in Pueblo. I can only find him in Denver, anyone find something different?
No he is in denver. I know that for a fact. My brother in law lived in Denver for 25 years and he knows the place. He's been there and it is in denver. I also ran across that site. And thats why I called him. So if you have denver you are right. If you don't than keep what you want. Okay.
Hope that helps.
#75
ar angel 06 wrote:brainfart wrote:Toots that was in response to chiefs answer for 75, go back a pge you see his link.
If you said Chief was on the right track with Nameless, Tx... I think I know what you are getting at, and I was thinking the same thing.
I guess I'm not following you guys, I find the Official part and the "its a wonder" I thought was because it took 6 tries, I'm clueless on the track part.
Re: #75
chiefcw wrote:ar angel 06 wrote:brainfart wrote:Toots that was in response to chiefs answer for 75, go back a pge you see his link.
If you said Chief was on the right track with Nameless, Tx... I think I know what you are getting at, and I was thinking the same thing.
I guess I'm not following you guys, I find the Official part and the "its a wonder" I thought was because it took 6 tries, I'm clueless on the track part.
It has nothing to do with a 'track' just that you are on the right track to the answer... its not Nameless, Texas, but very close. Keep researching and I think you'll find it.
