Reply
Thu 3 Aug, 2006 06:43 pm
By Paul Andrew Bourne
The issue of sexuality, sexology and intercourse between consenting adults continue to be discussion within the limited breath of morality. If this discourse is to beginning to seek an understanding of the premise upon which sex is practised can we openly argue that any area of consent is 'wrong'.
Let us discussed this issue of 'consenting sexual intercourse between two, or more people within the scope of wrong and-or right, and say why you have taken that stance without a simplistic approach of the 'bible' said so.
I try to treat other people as I expect to be treated.
I don't farm out the decision making process of what and who I do in bed.
This should probably be in the Religion & Spirituality forum or the Philosophy & Debate forum.
Re: 'Homosexuality versus Hetrosexuality'
paul andrew bourne wrote:
Let us discussed this issue of 'consenting sexual intercourse between two, or more people within the scope of wrong and-or right, and say why you have taken that stance without a simplistic approach of the 'bible' said so.
Rape is wrong as it means using someones body without their consent.
Consentual sex is right because everybody involved has said yes.
Without sex none of us would exist or be on this forum to discuss things like this.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace