0
   

Senate committee ‘dismayed’ with delay in opening U.S.-Mexic

 
 
ehBeth
 
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 05:39 pm
Business/politics?

They surely overlap again.

~~~~~~~

Quote:
A Senate committee scolded the "disappointing results" of FMCSA officials in moving toward the opening of the U.S.-Mexico border to Mexican motor carriers.

A report released by the Senate Transportation Appropriations Committee took to task the slow response by states to comply with rules issued by Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that would ultimately facilitate opening the border to Mexican trucks.

The committee's disappointment dates back to before 2002.

Before the 2002 Transportation Appropriations Act mandated that safety requirements must be met for Mexican motor carriers to enter the U.S., meetings were held discussing the steps FMCSA officials had made to move forward on opening the border to Mexican trucks.

In those meetings the Department of Transportation's Inspector General pointed out that, even though FMCSA issued a rule requiring states authorize their enforcement personnel to take action when they encounter a vehicle without valid operating authority, only two states had taken action at that time.

And now, three years later - and well after FMCSA's Sept. 30, 2003, deadline for states to comply - some states still have not provided that authority.

"The committee is frustrated and dismayed to learn of the slow responsiveness by several states in complying with this federal requirement," according to the report.

One disappointment outlined in the report is that the provision mandating the opening of the border to Mexican trucks requires all inspectors of Mexican trucks place a Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance decal showing the vehicle meets all of the necessary requirements.

"Given the Agency's disappointing results in compelling compliance by the states … the Committee directs the Administrator to redouble … efforts and take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that states come into full compliance with all the safety requirements and intent set forth" by Congress.


what's this going to mean for U.S. truckers?

will the Mexican trucks truly be held to the higher U.S./Canadian standards?

will health/safety in U.S./Mexican border states be impacted by Mexican trucks that don't meet the stated standards?

why is the U.S. Senate pushing this?

~~~~~~~~~~

lotsa questions - anyone got answers?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 809 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 05:40 pm
oops

the link

http://www.landlinemag.com/todays_news/Daily/2006/Jul06/072106.htm
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 07:38 pm
*shrugs* I can't find a copy of the actual Senate Transportation Appropriations Committee comments any where on line and the FMCSA doesn't have anything listed in their "News" or "Congressional Testimony" links related to this.

Very confusing...
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 08:18 pm
Senate Report 109-109 - TRANSPORTATION, TREASURY, THE JUDICIARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2006
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 08:21 pm
and since I'm poking around on this in any case

Air Quality Concerns Relating to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
and Free Commercial Vehicle Travel in California
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 08:27 pm
and I'd like to find a direct link to this ...
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 08:32 pm
http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/briefs/03-358/03-358.pet.rep.html

(not related to the current article, but related to my questions)
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 10:10 am
In today's LandLine ...

Quote:
OOIDA says proposed border program a ?'mistake'

Comments published this week from the acting U.S. transportation secretary sparked a strong statement from OOIDA against a future pilot program that would allow Mexican truckers beyond the 20-mile southern border commercial zone to which they are now restricted.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association was reacting to comments from Acting U.S. Secretary of Transportation Maria Cino that appeared in an interview published in the July 24 issue of Traffic World magazine.

The magazine quoted Cino as having said that the proposed one-year pilot program would involve about 100 Mexican motor carriers and could be unveiled by the end of 2006.

Speaking on behalf of OOIDA, Executive Vice President Todd Spencer said the pilot program is a "mistake" because the United States is not in a position to address the safety and security issues of Mexico-domiciled trucks and trucking companies operating with free reign on U.S. highways.

Laws governing the trucking industry restrict trucks and drivers from Mexico and Canada to carrying international shipments between their home countries and individual points in the U.S. Those same laws prohibit foreign trucks and drivers from moving loads from point to point within U.S. borders.

"Not a single state enforces the directives established by Congress in 2001 regarding Mexican motor carriers," Spencer said, referring to the FY 2002 Transportation Appropriations legislation that lays out specific criteria for the U.S. and Mexican governments to establish prior to fully opening American roadways to Mexican trucks.

The legislation also imposed comprehensive safety requirements on Mexican trucking companies before they are granted conditional authority and allowed into the U.S. Among other requirements, safety exams must verify that Mexican trucking firms have drug and alcohol-testing programs, proof of insurance and qualified drivers with clean driving records.

OOIDA maintains that truck safety considerations and serious homeland security concerns remain regarding Mexican-domiciled drivers and trucking companies. Spencer also pointed out many other issues remain involving immigration, customs, reduced tax revenue for roads as well as the impact on the U.S. trucking industry and the livelihoods of American truck drivers.

"Without having fully complied with congressional directives, a move by the U.S. Department of Transportation to open U.S. roadways to Mexican trucks puts the interest of foreign trade and cheap labor ahead of everything else, including highway safety, homeland security and the wellbeing of hardworking Americans," Spencer said.

Spencer indicated that the association would be reviewing all available options in response to a pilot program.


landlinemag
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Leveraged Loan - Discussion by gollum
Web Site - Discussion by gollum
Corporate Fraud - Discussion by gollum
Enron Scandal - Discussion by gollum
Buying From Own Pension Fund - Discussion by gollum
iPhones - Question by gollum
Paycheck Protection Plan - Question by gollum
Dog Sniffing Electronics - Question by gollum
SIM CARD - SimTraveler - Question by gollum
Physical Bitcoin - Question by gollum
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Senate committee ‘dismayed’ with delay in opening U.S.-Mexic
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/18/2026 at 07:44:08