1
   

British anger at Israeli terror celebration

 
 
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 02:16 pm
Quote:
The Times July 20, 2006

British anger at terror celebration

By Ned Parker and Stephen Farrell

The commemoration of Israeli bombings that killing 92 people has caused offence



AS ISRAEL wages war against Hezbollah 'terrorists' in Lebanon, Britain has protested about the celebration by right-wing Israelis of a Jewish 'act of terrorism' against British rule 60 years ago this week.




The rightwingers, including Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Prime Minister, are commemorating the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of British rule, that killed 92 people and helped to drive the British from Palestine.

They have erected a plaque outside the restored building, and are holding a two-day seminar with speeches and a tour of the hotel by one of the Jewish resistance fighters involved in the attack.

Simon McDonald, the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv, and John Jenkins, the Consul-General in Jerusalem, have written to the municipality, stating: 'We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.'

In particular they demanded the removal of the plaque that pays tribute to the Irgun, the Jewish resistance branch headed by Menachem Begin, the future Prime Minister, which carried out the attack on July 22, 1946.

The plaque presents as fact the Irgun's claim that people died because the British ignored warning calls. 'For reasons known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated,' it states.

Mr McDonald and Dr Jenkins denied that the British had been warned, adding that even if they had 'this does not absolve those who planted the bomb from responsibility for the deaths'. On Monday city officials agreed to remove the language deemed offensive from the blue sign hanging on the hotel's gates, though that had not been done shortly before it was unveiled last night.

The controversy over the plaque and the two-day celebration of the bombing, sponsored by Irgun veterans and the right-wing Menachem Begin Heritage Centre, goes to the heart of the debate over the use of political violence in the Middle East. Yesterday Mr Netanyahu argued in a speech celebrating the attack that the Irgun were governed by morals, unlike fighters from groups such as Hamas.

'It's very important to make the distinction between terror groups and freedom fighters, and between terror action and legitimate military action,' he said. 'Imagine that Hamas or Hezbollah would call the military headquarters in Tel Aviv and say, 'We have placed a bomb and we are asking you to evacuate the area'. -

But the view of the attack was very different in 1946 when The Times branded the Irgun 'terrorists in disguise'. Decades later, Irgun veterans are unrepentant. Sarah Agassi, 80, remembers spying in the King David Hotel.

She and a fellow agent posed as a couple. They danced tangos and waltzes, sipped whisky and wine while they cased out the hotel.

On the day her brother and his fellow fighters posed as Arabs delivering milk and brought seven milk churns, each containing 50kg of explosives, into the building. Ms Agassi waited across the street until her brother rushed out. She said that she then made the warning call to the British command in the hotel.

Sitting in the luxurious hotel lobby, she expressed no regret. 'We fought for our independence. We thought it was the right way . . . If I had to fight for Israel, I swear even now I would do anything.'

Continued...


Israel celebrates the act of terror carried out against the British (and initially blamed on Arabs).

The British are understandably annoyed.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 654 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
stevewonder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 01:31 pm
Why are the British annoyed?
Israel has the right to slaughter who it likes when it likes!
and not just that you and me will pay for it and keep our mouths shut!
Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 01:38 pm
The pattern is that Arab terrorists commit some atrocity against Israel, usually against its civilians, not by accident, but on purpose, and then Israel takes a military action in response, as it must. You're nothing but a rabid anti-semite, all of your rationalizations, obfuscations, and posturing notwithstanding.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 03:12 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
The pattern is that Arab terrorists commit some atrocity against Israel...


Brandon9000, what has that got to do with this topic ?

The thread title is 'British anger at Israeli terror celebration' .

Can you NOT read ?

Seriously now, are you just acting stupid or were you born like that ?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 08:38 pm
freedom4free wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
The pattern is that Arab terrorists commit some atrocity against Israel...


Brandon9000, what has that got to do with this topic ?

The thread title is 'British anger at Israeli terror celebration' .

Can you NOT read ?

Seriously now, are you just acting stupid or were you born like that ?

My point, which is on-topic, is that Israel is not a terrorist state, but that its enemies are. Israel's actions are only what any functional country would do in response to the terrorism of its enemies. You're merely a Jew hater, all rationalizations and obfuscations to the contrary.
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 11:25 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
My point, which is on-topic, is that Israel is not a terrorist state, but that its enemies are. Israel's actions are only what any functional country would do in response to the terrorism of its enemies. You're merely a Jew hater, all rationalizations and obfuscations to the contrary.


Disagreeing with Israeli violence, past or present, does not make one an anti-semite; just as criticising US foreign policy does not make one anti-American. Even if F4F is an anti-semite, that does not mean he is by definition wrong in everything he says. Israeli forces have carried out many actions that are not compatible with international law and some that fulfil all characteristics of terrorist acts.

Begin bombed a hotel full of people and Sharon murdered a Swedish UN negotiator, both these facts are admitted by Israel, but no apology has ever been made and both these men with terrorist credentials became leaders of Israel.

And now Israel has precision bombed a UN observation post after receiving ten urgent requests by the UN to stop shelling the post. An unarmed countryman of mine was killed. One remembers this is not the first time that Israel has struck at the UN. I condemn these actions, not the Jewish people. If you attack me ad hominem with an epithet like anti-semite, that means you have no arguments to justify the facts above.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 02:21 pm
Brandon9000
Quote:

My point...Israel is not a terrorist state...


Really, what do you call this then ?

Quote:
Israeli Foreknowledge of the Bombing of US Marines In Beirut

In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon and President Reagan sent 1800 marines to Beirut to act as peace keepers. Israel resented the interference and used the US presence to commit a False Flag operation that killed 242 marines.

The purpose was to align the US with Israel and create animosity toward Arab world
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 10:49 pm
freedom4free wrote:
Brandon9000
Quote:

My point...Israel is not a terrorist state...


Really, what do you call this then ?

Quote:
Israeli Foreknowledge of the Bombing of US Marines In Beirut

In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon and President Reagan sent 1800 marines to Beirut to act as peace keepers. Israel resented the interference and used the US presence to commit a False Flag operation that killed 242 marines.

The purpose was to align the US with Israel and create animosity toward Arab world

A fantasy. Let's see some real evidence.
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 11:09 pm
Paaskynen wrote:
Begin bombed a hotel full of people and Sharon murdered a Swedish UN negotiator, .


Correction, it was Yitzak Shamir, a leader of the Stern gang, not Sharon, who was involved in the assassination of Folke Bernadotte. Sorry for the mix-up.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » British anger at Israeli terror celebration
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 03:09:48