1
   

This May Offend The Pious

 
 
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 01:36 pm
i think though theologically god is not what we seem to perceive him for he is nothing more than a necessary entity created totally out of prehistoric brain. as much as i think that god is a not i truly believe god is dead

R.I.P God

but now we have a new god : the devil. for present situation truly demands his presence to go along with his actual meaning.

sorry if i offend some so called pious

then again i don't care.

666silhouette666
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,866 • Replies: 40
No top replies

 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 02:51 pm
Re: This May Offend The Pious
sillhouette wrote:
i think though theologically god is not what we seem to perceive him for he is nothing more than a necessary entity created totally out of prehistoric brain.



as much as i think that god is a not i truly believe god is dead

R.I.P God

So is he dead or was he never alive?

Quote:

but now we have a new god : the devil. for present situation truly demands his presence to go along with his actual meaning.

Wait, you don't believe there is any such thing as god(or do you?) but yet you believe in the existence of the devil? And just what is this actual meaning?
Quote:

sorry if i offend some so called pious

then again i don't care.

So are you sorry or are you not sorry?
Quote:

666silhouette666

666? Don't you mean 616?
0 Replies
 
sillhouette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 03:00 pm
to answer all your questions
^to answer all the questions above^

1. i do belive there is some positive entity somewhere in the bounds of our universe. but this spirit/being is not my god.

2. i am sorry in a way so i will not get banned or kicked.

3. The Number is 666 in modern texts, although 616 appeared in 2005 on an ancient manuscript. The meaning of the number is -->debated<--
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 03:19 pm
616?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 03:21 pm
fascinating
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 03:38 pm
In my Bible, the number is actually 616, and I think it has a footnote that says "In some texts, this number is 666..."

When I first questioned "religion," I pondered the possibility that the whole thing was a brilliant plan to keep the poor from killing the rich.

Have you ever noticed how poor people, who may be hungry, can just walk by a mega-rich person and go on their way...? How homeless people can stand dutifully outside fabulous dining establishments, looking in?

I know you may say law enforcement makes all this happen, but I think if we had law enforcement with no moral or religious belief, pretty soon law enforcement would be overthrown.

It (religion/morality) does seem like the invention of rich and powerful to protect their interests, doesn't it sometimes? Is it the biggest barrier to anarchy?

Anyway. This was my first questioning theory.
0 Replies
 
sillhouette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 03:51 pm
As to the number, either or is ok although i choose 666 as a favor.

I am not an atheist if that clears things up, i just belive in a different god. as to the poor, i respect them and when possible i give them charity. i don't understand what you mean by law enforcement should have religion. i don't see how that changes the way they work. the moral part i do understand though. i think all people should be respected no matter what the religion is. many pious christians have tried to convert my beliefs and i dislike that practice allot. if i choose to worship another god, i should have every right to.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 04:06 pm
You misunderstood what I wrote.

But, no matter.
0 Replies
 
sillhouette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 04:07 pm
i am sorry if i did.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 04:09 pm
No problem, dear. Happy you're here. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
najmelliw
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 04:28 pm
LOL.

God is RIP, instead there is the devil? Well, since good and evil are quite debatable properties, and depend on the character and inclinations of the debater. It can be posed that you simply substitute one god for the other.
Besides... Good and evil are meaningless concepts without the other, they need thier opposite to define themselves.
So if there is a god, there is adevil, and vice versa
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 04:29 pm
lash wrote:
Quote:
When I first questioned "religion," I pondered the possibility that the whole thing was a brilliant plan to keep the poor from killing the rich.


There were times...

My biggest problem with the debate on god and religion is the attitude we tend to have towards the issues.

There are thousands of years of assumptions and misguided interpetations between what the texts intended meaning and what we find in them today.
This is a fact for wich me make hardly any allowance at all.

Even bonafide science operates on assumptions in testing the validity of theories.
Is it not possible then that the many writers of the many old manuscripts followed a similar procedure.
What do we know about what someone living thousands of years ago thought to be too obvious to bear mentioning?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 05:35 pm
Quote:
This May Offend The Pious



Don't be so bloody silly. You can't offend the pious. They are beyond your narrow and superficial reach. You are having yourself on.

The idea that you "may" offend the pious is so infantile that it can only have been thought up by someone who thinks of themselves as having significance.
0 Replies
 
sillhouette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 05:38 pm
so judging by your tone, i'd say you were offended and can't accept my point of veiw? Oh so i'm narrow minded...
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 05:44 pm
or he's just tired of trying to offend the pious... Question
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 05:48 pm
You couldn't offend me with words however important you felt yourself to be.

And I'm not all that pious.
0 Replies
 
sillhouette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 06:24 pm
so if i cant offend you why did you seem soooo offended and taken back? you offend me by not telling me. all i did was express my self
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 08:44 pm
Welcome to the forum, sil. I'm sure you will have fun here. :wink:
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 09:22 pm
Damn, Spendi...breathe!


Welcome to A2K, Sillhouette.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Jul, 2006 09:29 pm
Lash wrote:
When I first questioned "religion," I pondered the possibility that the whole thing was a brilliant plan to keep the poor from killing the rich.

Opium for the people... ;-)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » This May Offend The Pious
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 02:46:14