lash wrote:
Quote:When I first questioned "religion," I pondered the possibility that the whole thing was a brilliant plan to keep the poor from killing the rich.
There were times...
My biggest problem with the debate on god and religion is the attitude we tend to have towards the issues.
There are thousands of years of assumptions and misguided interpetations between what the texts intended meaning and what we find in them today.
This is a fact for wich me make hardly any allowance at all.
Even bonafide science operates on assumptions in testing the validity of theories.
Is it not possible then that the many writers of the many old manuscripts followed a similar procedure.
What do we know about what someone living thousands of years ago thought to be too obvious to bear mentioning?