1
   

Hundreds of WMD's Found in Iraq

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:07 am
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622055545.07o4imol.html

Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq: US intelligence
Jun 22 1:56 AM US/Eastern


US-led coalition forces in Iraq have found some 500 chemical weapons since the March 2003 invasion, Republican lawmakers said, citing an intelligence report.

"Since 2003, Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent," said an overview of the report unveiled by Senator Rick Santorum and Peter Hoekstra, head of the intelligence committee of the House of Representatives.



"Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf war chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf war chemical munitions are assessed to still exist," it says.

The lawmakers cited the report as validation of the US rationale for the war, and stressed the ongoing danger they pose.

"This is an incredibly -- in my mind -- significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false," Santorum said.

A Pentagon official who confirmed the findings said that all the weapons were pre-1991 vintage munitions "in such a degraded state they couldn't be used for what they are designed for."

The official, who asked not to be identified, said most were 155 millimeter artillery projectiles with mustard gas or sarin of varying degrees of potency.

"We're destroying them where we find them in the normal manner," the official said.

In 2004, the US army said it had found a shell containing sarin gas and another shell containing mustard gas, and a Pentagon official said at the time the discovery showed there were likely more.

The intelligence overview published Wednesday stressed that the pre-Gulf War Iraqi chemical weapons could be sold on the black market.

"Use of these weapons by terrorists or insurgent groups would have implications for coalition forces in Iraq. The possibility of use outside Iraq cannot be ruled out," it said.

Santorum said the two-month-old report was prepared by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a military intelligence agency that started looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when the Iraq Survey Group stopped doing so in late 2004.

Last year the head of Iraq Survey Group, Charles Duelfer, said that insurgents in Iraq had already used old chemical weapons in their attacks.

Nevertheless, "the impression that the Iraqi Survey Group left with the American people was they didn't find anything," Hoekstra said.

"But this says: Weapons have been discovered; more weapons exist. And they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," he said.

Asked just how dangerous the weapons are, Hoekstra said: "One or two of these shells, the materials inside of these, transferred outside of the country, can be very, very deadly."

The report said that the purity of the chemical agents -- and thus their potency -- depends on "many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives, and environmental storage conditions."

"While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," it said.

Reporters questioned the lawmakers as to why the Bush administration had not played up the report to boost their case for continued warfare in Iraq.

"The administration has been very clear that they want to look forward," Santorum said. "They felt it was not their role to go back and fight previous discussions."

Fear that Saddam Hussein might use his alleged arsenal of chemical and biological weapons was a reason US officials gave for launching the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 684 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:18 am
just in time for mid term elections.... gee that bush is a lucky guy....
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:34 am
degraded weapons that were non functional. Whoopie.
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:48 am
"Mubtakkar" is the new worry ... coming to a theatre near you?

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1205309,00.html
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:52 am
So basically hundreds of WMD's found at Home Depot, too!

I wonder what the left wingers will do about this.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 06:56 am
Quote:
A Pentagon official who confirmed the findings said that all the weapons were pre-1991 vintage munitions "in such a degraded state they couldn't be used for what they are designed for."


So... where are the WMDs and WMD programs from 2003?

Santorum called. He wants his hook, line and sinker back.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 07:30 am
The age and/or condition of the munitions discovered is immaterial. Their existence and post-war discovery confirm that Saddam's claim to have disclosed and disposed of all proscribed assets and capabilities was a lie, and further demonstrate that the UN inspections were not effective. Coupled with the evidence of Saddam's ongoing obstruction and duplicity, his surreptitious husbanding (under the guise of "dual use" as well as through outright concealment) of resources and capabilities suitable for the resumption of development and production of prohibited technologies, his clear intent to do so, his subversion through graft and corruption of UN oversight, and the revelations provided through the as-yet-barely-begun translation of the warehousesful of captured documents unambiguously refute many of the objections posed by those in opposition to military intervention.

Not that it will matter to some.
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 08:07 am
cjhsa wrote:
So basically hundreds of WMD's found at Home Depot, too!

I wonder what the left wingers will do about this.


Laughing
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 08:43 am
timberlandko wrote:
The age and/or condition of the munitions discovered is immaterial.

Rolling Eyes

I'll have to disagree with that one. The war was sold on the basis that Hussein had ongoing WMD programs, and drones that could deliver it to US targets.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 08:48 am
bm
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:00 am
I see the Defense Dept. slamed this report. Said these weapons were pre 1991 and degraded, meaning they were worthless. They said these were not the weapons we went to war over.

Santorum says he wants to know who the spokesperson was. Boy, I bet he's in trouble. Probably some communist. Hope he can find a new job.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/06/22.html#a8810
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:04 am
More bullshit. I don't even bother to read this Republican crap anymore.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:06 am
xingu wrote:
I see the Defense Dept. slamed this report.


And that even first reported by FOX! Shocked
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:12 am
We ought to require our representatives to be under oath at all times.

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:14 am
Santorum is desperate to get re-elected. Polls show he's losing to Casey. I guess he's hoping some inert weapons will get him some more voters.

He just doesn't get it.

http://www.citizensvoice.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=16822238&BRD=2259&PAG=461&dept_id=455154&rfi=6
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Hundreds of WMD's Found in Iraq
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 07:56:53