0
   

Theology as an A2K topic.

Forums: Spirituality And Religion
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
dyslexia
 
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:21 pm
It seems to me that the most consistent theological content for topics of spirituality/religion on A2k are about as rational as
Quote:
When counting the number of angels who can stand on the head of a pin, should the counting be done metric or arabic?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,634 • Replies: 26
No top replies

 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:25 pm
Will no one stand up for binary or hexadecimal? Clearly, there exists here an atmosphere restrictive of free and open thought.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:31 pm
I always use Roman numerals when making such spiritual calculations.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:32 pm
Well, this is already getting to be contentious. How on earth can you speak of angels in hexadecimal or binary terms??? Angels have been balancing on the tip of a pin for billions of years. That's a fact. Obviously, they aren't too bright, but there ya go--they have a thing for pins.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:33 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Will no one stand up for binary or hexadecimal? Clearly, there exists here an atmosphere restrictive of free and open thought.

Exactly, and it's your fault.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:36 pm
I thought Leviticus didn't like binary...
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:37 pm
dyslexia wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
Will no one stand up for binary or hexadecimal? Clearly, there exists here an atmosphere restrictive of free and open thought.

Exactly, and it's your fault.


It's not Timber's fault. It's all the unGodly riff-raff who can't -- or won't -- see the truth which was made plain to us all by ...uh...who was that masked man anyway? Anyway, it's the atheists and eggnostics on these threads that are getting in the way of a Higher Understanding.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:39 pm
ossobuco wrote:
I thought Leviticus didn't like binary...

Leviticus couldn't count high enough to use binary. (zeros where beneath him)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:44 pm
This is an abject example of persecution. I start a simple thread asking for personal experiences of angel counting and hostile angry heathens barge in to disrupt. Go start your own thread and leave use sincere posters alone with our dignity.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:45 pm
Octal is obviously the appropriate format. How could you see the little devils otherwise?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:48 pm
Merry Andrew wrote:
I always use Roman numerals when making such spiritual calculations.


V/quinque

http://www.heart-disease-bypass-surgery.com/data/images/headofpinlow.jpg
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 02:50 pm
Catholic Germans are elitists.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:02 pm
I'm even better: I can count up to VI sex!
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:27 pm
Well dys-

I've never met one angel who could balance on a pin.

Unless it's a rolling pin of course.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:28 pm
Really, the numbers are irrelevant, the REAL question is the intent of our heavenly carer in thusly manifesting angels...what does s/he wish us to learn from these angelic terpsichorean revels?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:34 pm
dlowan wrote:
Really, the numbers are irrelevant, the REAL question is the intent of our heavenly carer in thusly manifesting angels...what does s/he wish us to learn from these angelic terpsichorean revels?

Quite obviously, harmony of the spheres.(and toe shoes)
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:47 pm
Are angels in mid-arabesque part of the calculation?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 03:59 pm
dyslexia wrote:
dlowan wrote:
Really, the numbers are irrelevant, the REAL question is the intent of our heavenly carer in thusly manifesting angels...what does s/he wish us to learn from these angelic terpsichorean revels?

Quite obviously, harmony of the spheres.(and toe shoes)



How can we learn harmony of the spheres?


I believe you are not taking my religious beliefs perfectly seriously and without question, which, given that any questioning of my religious beliefs is persocally insulting, means you have insulted me!



You beast.


I am retiring to have a hissy fit.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 04:01 pm
Aren't pinheads flat?
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2006 04:09 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Aren't pinheads flat?

I've known a few who were rather buxom.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
Family files lawsuit against school over Jesus - Discussion by Baldimo
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Theology as an A2K topic.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 01:37:42
▲ ▼