Reply
Thu 15 May, 2003 05:56 pm
Alarm raised on world's disappearing languages
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
15 May 2003 - UK Independent
The number of "living" languages spoken in the world is dwindling faster than the decline in the planet's wildlife, according to a new study.
A comparison of the factors affecting the loss of languages and the demise of wild animals has found that the world's 6,000-plus tongues are facing the biggest risk of extinction.
"The threats to birds and mammals are well known but it turns out that languages are far more threatened," said Professor Bill Sutherland, a population biologist at the University of East Anglia in Norwich.
Linguists estimate that there are 6,809 "living" languages in the world today, but 90 per cent of them are spoken by fewer than 100,000 people, and some languages are even rarer - 46 are known to have just one native speaker. "There are 357 languages with under 50 speakers. Rare languages are more likely to show evidence of decline than commoner ones," Professor Sutherland said.
By applying the same principles used to classify the risk to birds and mammals, Professor Sutherland demonstrated that languages were subject to similar forces of extinction.
In the study published in Nature, Professor Sutherland found that the factors that increased the diversity of animal species - notably forest cover, tropical climates and mountainous topography - were also those that influence the richness of local languages. "Countries with large numbers of languages are those with the most forests, are nearer the tropics and with mountain ranges. The same factors affect the number of bird species," he said.
Over the past 500 years, about 4.5 per cent of the total number of described languages have disappeared, compared with 1.3 per cent of birds and 1.9 per cent of mammals. Colonisation has had the strongest influence. Of the 176 living languages spoken by the tribes of North America, 52 have become extinct since 1600. Of the 235 languages spoken by the Aboriginal Australians, 31 have disappeared.
Professor Sutherland said that when comparisons were made to threatened animals, there was a substantially higher proportion of languages that could be considered "critically endangered", "endangered" or "vulnerable" - the three classifications used to describe the threat to birds and mammals. "My extinction risk classification for languages is conservative ... Even with this, it is clear that the risks to languages exceed those to birds and mammals," Professor Sutherland said.
A well-established phenomenon that comes into play when a species declines to small numbers is called the Allee effect - for example when further breeding drops off because animals have difficulty finding a mate. A similar effect may also occur with rare languages. "People just don't want to learn them because they know there are so few others who can speak it," he said. The Leco language of the Bolivian Andes, for instance, is spoken by about 20 people. The Cambap language of Cameroon in Central Africa is used by just 30 native speakers.
Some languages are important because they contain unique characteristics. The Yeli Dnye tongue of the people who live on Rossel Island, in Papua New Guinea, for example, contains unusual sounds and a vocabulary that upsets the universal terminology for describing colours.
Professor Sutherland found that although mountains, forests and the tropics were common factors behind the diversity of animals and languages, both types of extinction did not necessarily occur in the same regions of the world.
Between 200 and 250 languages are spoken by more than a million people, with Chinese Mandarin, English and Spanish being the three most popular tongues.
There is a discussion on this article in progress on the "other languages" forum.
Craven
Thanks, Craven, I was not aware the story had been posted there, in fact, I failed to notice the language thread.
BumbleBeeBoogie
Craven: Have you just noticed? 25 year ago a good friend of mine received his doctorate in dead languages. Some of those languages were, even then, known only to a few dozen people who were members of tribes that no longer flourished. Written records never existed, since many peoples had none. He spent many hours recording the spoken languages, with English translations, to record these lost languates. Are you naive? No one noticed then, and not many notice now. What's more, not many seem to care.
I don't know and don't pretend to, but my guess is that every diversity of life on this planet, except for human beings, (and that only in carefully prescribed limits) including the wild life that you mention, have taken precedence over everyting else on this planet.
Well, this is, in my opinion, a natural process, and it does not have any connection to anyone's bad will. People tend to proceed from tribal to national social organization, and in course of this process some languages tend to disappear, since nation needs some common language to be spoken for normal functioning. Tribal languages become an obstacle for their carriers to make a career in the modern societies, and they are being gradually replaced by the national ones.
Trailertrash,
What are you talking about re "have I noticed" and re "naive"?
All I have posted here is that there is another topic about the same article.
BBB
I would ask being naive about such things. Does it really matter. These many different languages and dialects arose as a result of groups of people being cutoff and having no intercourse with each other. That is no longer true and the world has become an interdependent unit so much so that English has become an almost universal language< much to the chagrin of the French>. In any event the myriad of languages are of no value and are as they should be relegated to books on the history of dead languages.
au 1929
au 1929, I have mixed feelings about these occurences. It is sad that languages become extinct because they preserve the history of the speakers. However, I believe that it would benefit humanity when the world's peoples can all understand each other without interpreters. I hope the resulting easier communication would bring more peace to the planet.
Esperanto was an attempt in that direction that failed, so I don't know what it will take to achieve common language understanding.
----BumbleBeeBoogie
BBB,
Interestingly enough Esperanto's firt version was tossed in a fire by the creator's father who thought his son might be mistaken for a cryptologist and arrested.
Esperanto is really Esperanto 2.0.0.
And as the most popular such language I'd not call it a failure. Nobody expected it to be adopted as a first language.
Please accept my apology for my stupid remarks. Sorry.
No worries. I was just wondering if I misread.
Well, I'm not quite ready to consign all those obscure languages to the scrap heap. As BBB has noted, once a language is gone, a lot more is lost as well. And think of how it must feel to be the last living speaker of a language?
While I applaud the idea of everyone understanding everyone else, I don't think it's worth the sacrifice of all languages but English. On the other hand, just think, you could walk into a McDonald's anywhere in the world and be asked, "Do you want to super-size that?" Oh, brave new world!
And welcome to A2K, Trailertrash!