0
   

Failed States

 
 
xingu
 
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:26 pm
Quote:
Iraq, Afghanistan on 'failed states' index
Posted 5/2/2006 8:06 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) ?- Despite large-scale U.S. support, Iraq and Afghanistan rank among the world's 10 most vulnerable states, according to a private survey being released Tuesday.

In its second annual "failed states" index, Foreign Policy magazine and the Fund for Peace concluded that Sudan is the country under the most severe stress because of violent internal conflict.

Eleven of the 20 most vulnerable countries of the 148 examined in the survey are in Africa. The Democratic Republic of the Congo and Ivory Coast, both chronically volatile in recent years, ranked second and third.

Each country was given a score based on data from numerous available sources. A "failing state" was described as one in which the government does not have effective control of its territory, is not perceived as legitimate by a significant portion of its population, does not provide domestic security or basic public services to its citizens and lacks a monopoly on the use of force.

Sudan received low grades in virtually all areas surveyed, including protection of human rights, "group grievances" against the government and numbers of refugees and displaced persons. The western Sudanese region of Darfur has generated well over 2 million displaced since 2003.

According to the review, the situation in Iraq (No. 4) and Afghanistan (No. 10) deteriorated since 2005, the first year the survey was taken.

"For Iraq, the index category that worsened most was human flight," the report said. "The exodus of Iraq's professional class has accelerated, leaving the country without the trained citizens it needs to staff important posts."

Iraq's instability was underscored in a State Department report last week that said fully 30% of all terrorist attacks worldwide last year occurred in Iraq.
In terms of available human resources, Afghanistan faces a somewhat different problem from Iraq, the report said. It pointed out that while educated Afghan exiles have been slow to return following the fall of the Taliban in 2001, overwhelmingly poor Afghan refugees have returned in large numbers from Iran and Pakistan.

"The result is a capital city busting at the seams but short of trained administrators, the report said.

Pakistan is another troubled country, the report said. Its inability to police the tribal areas near the Afghan border helped lead to one of the sharpest declines in overall score of any country on the index.

Other contributing factors were the devastating earthquake last October in Kashmir and simmering ethnic tensions.

The study debunks the notion that steady growth rates in China are making the country more stable. It found that China lost ground last year.
Pauline Baker, president of the Fund for Peace, said in an interview that the major factors behind China's vulnerability are inequality and corruption, which, she said, led to about 87,000 peasant protests last year.

Foreign Policy senior editor David Bosco said China is made up of the booming coastal region, and the interior, which has been left behind.
"There is a lot of discontent. The government is aware of the problem," he said.

Baker said India has greater social mobility and is more decentralized than China, possibly giving that country the upper hand over its more populous neighbor over the long haul.

Among countries that lost considerable ground last year in the survey's "index of instability," besides China and Pakistan, were Zimbabwe ("poor governance and endemic corruption) and Nigeria ("regional and religious fissures").

On the plus side, high oil prices have helped Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez solidify power and stabilize the country, the report said. Others registering significant gains were the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Bosnia.

Bosco said a major moderating factor in Bosnia is the lure of possible membership in the European Union.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LIST OF 'FAILED STATES'

The 60 most vulnerable states of the 148 countries examined in the second annual "failed states index" of Foreign Policy magazine and the Fund for Peace:

1. Sudan
2. Democratic Republic of Congo
3. Ivory Coast
4. Iraq
5. Zimbabwe
6. Chad
6. (Tie) Somalia
8. Haiti
9. Pakistan
10. Afghanistan
11. Guinea
11. (Tie) Liberia
13. Central African Republic
14. North Korea
15. Burundi
16. Yemen
16. (Tie) Sierra Leone
18. Myanmar
19. Bangladesh
20. Nepal
21. Uganda
22. Nigeria
22. (Tie) Uzbekistan
24. Rwanda
25. Sri Lanka
26. Ethiopia
27. Colombia
28. Kyrgyzstan
29. Malawi
30. Burkina Faso
31. Egypt
32. Indonesia
33. Syria
33. (Tie) Kenya
35. Bosnia-Herzegovina
36. Cameroon
37. Angola
37. Togo
39. Bhutan
39. Laos
41. Mauritania
42. Tajikistan
43. Russia
44. Niger
45. Turkmenistan
46. Guinea-Bissau
47. Cambodia
47. (Tie) Dominican Republic
49. Papua New Guinea
50. Belarus
51. Guatemala
52. Equatorial Guinea
52. (Tie) Iran
54. Eritrea
55. Serbia-Montenegro
56. Bolivia
57. China
57. (Tie) Moldova
59. Nicaragua
60. Georgia


What surprises me are some of the countries on the list; Russia, Iran and Egypt. Didn't think thay had that many problems.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 751 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:41 pm
bookmark
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:46 pm
Failed states? Thats the name of Noam Chyomskys new book.

http://www.allenandunwin.com/Media/pdfs/1741149142.pdf
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Jun, 2006 10:05 am
A "failed state": Moldova and its breakaway province Transdnyestria:

Quote:
Transdniester Detains Moldovan Police

June 16, 2006 -- Officials in Moldova's separatist region of Transdniester have arrested five Moldovan police officers on charges of spying.

Moldovan police dismissed the accusations as "absurd" and Interior Minister Gheorghe Papuc said the detentions were a "provocation."

The detentions signal a fresh rise in tensions between pro-Russian Transdniester and Moldova's pro-Western authorities.


Linked on that page:

The Transdniester Conflict

FROZEN CONFLICT: On January 11, 2006, RFE/RL's Washington office hosted a panel discussion on prospects for settling the Transdniester conflict. The roundtable featured STEFAN GLIGOR and STELA JANTUAN of the Information, Analysis, and Prognosis Service of the Moldovan parliament and ALEXANDRU FLENCHA, head of the information and analysis division of Moldova's Ministry of Reintegration.

READ The conflict between the Republic of Moldova and the unrecognized, separatist Transdniester Republic has festered for more than 15 years. A decade of talks supervised by the OSCE, Russia, and Ukraine have stagnated, while allegations mount concerning the involvement of Transdniester separatists in money-laundering and trafficking in arms, drugs, and human beings. With pressure rising for a resolution on the part of Russia, Ukraine, and the OSCE and new interest on the part of the European Union in monitoring activity along the Ukrainian-Moldovan frontier, what are the current prospects for settling this frozen conflict? (more)

LISTEN Listen to the complete panel discussion (about 90 minutes):
[URL=rtsp://realaudio.rferl.org/Online/OL120106/transdnest.rm]Real Audio[/URL] [URL=mms://realaudio.rferl.org/Online/OL120106/transdnest.wma]Windows Media[/URL]
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 08:29 pm
The list certainly seems to be accurate and is a good indication of why there is very little hope for world peace anytime in the near future.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 08:36 pm
Meanwhile, what is happening in Bosnia?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Failed States
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/10/2026 at 03:15:17