1
   

California Condor Killing

 
 
Piffka
 
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 11:30 am
From the LA Times:

April 30, 2003

A Kern County hunter was charged Tuesday with killing a California
condor -- one of the last born in the wild -- during a pig hunt earlier
this year on Tejon Ranch near Bakersfield.

Britton Cole Lewis, 29, of Tehachapi was charged with violating a
federal law protecting migratory birds by allegedly shooting the condor
known as AC-8, a matriarch of the federal government's $35-million
program to rescue the endangered bird from extinction. The incident
occurred on or about Feb. 8.

Lewis was not charged with violating the U.S. Endangered Species Act,
apparently because of a little-known 1998 Justice Department policy that
seeks a higher level of proof in such cases, according to a source
familiar with the investigation. Essentially a defendant must know the
animal was endangered, said the source, who asked for anonymity because
it is a pending legal matter.

Assistant U.S. Atty. E. Robert Wright, who is prosecuting the condor
case, confirmed that efforts were made to get the solicitor general's
office, which handles significant cases for the Justice Department, to
change the policy. He did not elaborate.

If convicted under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Lewis could
face up to six months in prison and a fine of $15,000. A violation of
the Endangered Species Act could bring a maximum one-year prison term
and a $100,000 fine.

The decision to prosecute Lewis under the lesser charge angered
environmentalists as well as those responsible for protecting the bird.
Only 79 condors remain in the wild today.

"It's a slap on his wrist and a slap in our faces," said Mike Clark, a
member of the condor recovery team at the Los Angeles Zoo. "He was
poaching, straight up. He's one of those people that give hunters a bad
name."

Michael Bean, senior attorney with Washington, D.C.-based Environmental
Defense, agreed that stronger action was needed. "The California condor
is one of the rarest species in the world. The effort to prevent its
extinction has been one of the most expensive conservation efforts the
United States has undertaken on the part of a species," Bean said.

"To pursue what amounts to a slap on the hand for killing this bird is
outrageous."

State Resources Secretary Mary Nichols said her office will determine
whether there is a need to bring additional charges against Lewis in
state court.

"It's a truly heinous crime that this man is charged with," Nichols
said. "It's important that the prosecutors send the message that we're
determined to restore these birds to their rightful places in the
environment."

AC-8 was among nine original condors captured in 1986 in a last-ditch
effort to save the species from extinction. Weighing at least 20 pounds
with a 9-foot wingspan, she spent the next 14 years in the federal
government's captive breeding program.

At 30 years old, the bird had produced a dozen offspring. She was
returned to the wild in April 2000 to serve as a mentor for younger,
captivity-bred condors released into the wild.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,943 • Replies: 25
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 11:34 am
Re: California Condor Killing
Piffka wrote:
A Kern County hunter was charged Tuesday with killing a California condor -- one of the last born in the wild -- during a pig hunt earlier this year on Tejon Ranch near Bakersfield.


Apparently this idiot heard the term "when pigs fly" a few to many times. I'd find it awful to hard to believe he shot the Condor without knowing that he never should have been shooting at it to begin with. Let him rot in hell.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 11:43 am
So stupid and senseless.

I am sickened that he, who was 29, killed her, a 30 year-old bird whose memories and skills were supposed to be passed on to new generations. To me, this is the world going to hell in a handbasket.

I feel like crying.
0 Replies
 
bobsmyth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 12:17 pm
California Condor Killing
Indiscriminate killing always has made my blood boil. To have it compounded by such a unique species in such a precarious situation infuriates me. I have a special regard for this program as a volunteer for U S Fish and Wildlife. As such a friend and I band migrating hawks. The information garnered over 33 years of banding allows decision making regarding habitat, protection of wetlands etc to be more efficient and accurate to protect this national resource.
Actions such as this may tempt some to stop. What's the use they could think. The answer of course is you never stop. You do whatever you can to make this planet as good as it can be. Let's face it. This is the only world we've got.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 12:26 pm
This January, the only free living wolf in Lower Saxony (German state) was killed - with a shot through the shoulder to the heart - by a hunter "in self-defence", distance about 30 yards.

Therefore, the hunter was acquitted without a charge.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 03:54 pm
Oh no. I'm so sorry to hear about the last wolf of Saxony, Walter.

BobSmyth is right, it is the only world we've got. Thank heavens there are still some free areas of wilderness. I think we have to work to keep those last bits of wilderness protected and safe from encroachment through motorized vehicles or worse.

Walk or ride a horse in, but don't make roads, don't cut trees, don't allow mining and don't kill the animals! Does that cover it???
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 03:59 pm
[Actually it was LOWER Saxony. And not really the "last wolf" (that must have in 18th century), but the last 'immigrated' (from Poland) of the species there.]
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 04:13 pm
Oh. There's a Saxony and a Lower Saxony?? Gosh, I need to visit Germany! Was the wolf being reintroduced or had it come from Poland naturally?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 06:21 pm
I'd like to vote for the last two - can I vote for two at once?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 06:37 pm
Of course! That's the way I feel, Littlek.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 06:40 pm
You know, they can sue him, he can get hate mail, he can repent (it could happen), he might even feel guilt for years. BUT, that condor isn't coming back.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 06:55 pm
Oh, god, it makes me feel sick... especially since the one who died was in captivity for so long and had finally been released to "teach" the newly released hatchlings. Ugh.... it's like genocide. What the heck is wrong with people, anyway?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 06:58 pm
I dunno.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 08:02 pm
<sigh>

and y'know... even though a2k is so full of enlightened, intelligent people, only two people voted in the poll. I was one. Not that many people care anymore. Greenies are out.

<sigh>
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 09:00 pm
Nah, greenies aren't 'out'.
0 Replies
 
bobsmyth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2003 11:21 pm
California Condor Killing
If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound. It does when we who care make it for them. A lot of people hear that sound from me.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 May, 2003 08:13 am
Bobsmyth, I like you!
0 Replies
 
bobsmyth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 May, 2003 09:46 am
California Condor Killing
Thanks Piffka. Me too you. Greenies are still heard. For an example when DDT was threatening birds in the 50's and 60's the brilliant Rachel Carson produced "Silent Spring". Enumerating the evidence of the calamitous results of continued use of this toxin caused bird groups especially and others to exert pressure for its removal.
If you want to see an impressive list of sources take a look at a copy of this book and read the 28 pages of source material
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 May, 2003 10:09 am
Thanks! We Greenies have to stick together!

You are right and Silent Spring was awesome, but why does there have to be so much 'proof' before people get it? Why can't they just see? It seems so obvious to me. I'm glad to have scientific backing but.... <Why? Why? Why?>

Even if there was no source material, no scientific backing, no proof, humans should understand there is no good to come from killing off animal species or eroding wild places with development.

I met a man who is studying Merlins. He says because "we" already are protecting Peregrine Falcons, the environmental & wildlife agencies don't value this smaller falcon. He could get loads of federal money to study the Peregrine, but has to support his research of the Merlin on his own. (And they are very beautiful, interesting creatures!)


In wilderness is the preservation of the world.
Henry David Thoreau
0 Replies
 
quinn1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 May, 2003 02:09 pm
Piff..I would vote however...I think this person is an idiot...having poacher in there is as of yet unfounded. If he is a poacher then he should experience the full extent of the law and be called such.
I cant see how he shot a bird during pig hunt. Makes you shake your head.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » California Condor Killing
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 12:00:14