Reply
Fri 20 Jan, 2006 09:00 pm
1. The true world - attainable for the sage, the pious, the virtuous man, he lives in it, he is it.
(The oldest form of the idea, relatively sensible, simple, and persuasive. A circumlocution for the sentence, ?'I Plato, am the truth.')
2. The true world - unattainable for now, but promised for the sage, the pious, the virtuous man (?'for the sinner who repents').
(Progress of the idea: it becomes more subtle, insidious, incomprehensible - it becomes female, it becomes Christian.)
3. The true world - unattainable, indemonstrable, unpromisable; but the very thought of it - a consolation, an obligation, an imperative.
(At bottom, the old sun, but seen through mist and skepticism. The idea has become elusive, pale, Nordic, Königsbergian.)
4. The true world - unattainable? At any rate, unattained. And being unattained, also unknown. Consequently, not consoling, redeeming, or obligation: how could something unknown obligate us?
(Gray morning. The first yawn of reason. The cock-crow of positivism.)
5. The ?'true' world - an idea which is no longer good for anything, not even obligating - and idea which has become useless and superfluous - consequently a refuted idea: let us abolish it!
(Bright day; breakfast; return of bon sens and cheerfulness; Plato's embarrassed blush; pandemonium of all free spirits.)
6. The true world - we have abolished. What world has remained? The apparent one perhaps? But no! With the true world we have also abolished the apparent one.
(Noon; moment of the briefest shadow; end of the longest error; high point of humanity; INCIPIT ZARATHUSTRA.)
I believe Nietzsche's "true world" is parallel to Kant's "thing in itself," what stands behind the apparent world. I guess N saw them as two sides of one conceptual coin. That's why the abolishment of one (the world in itself) means the abolishment of the other (the appearances of the world).
I'm getting ready to read the impossible Zarathustra. Don't tell me how it ends!