The premise that man in his so-called "natural state" is any more dangerous than man in some so-called "unnatural state" (might we assume modern environ?) is not supported by the anthropological data.
In fact one could easily argue the reverse
0 Replies
extra medium
1
Reply
Sun 29 Jan, 2006 09:29 pm
Re: SOCIAL ORDER
paul andrew bourne wrote:
By Paul Andrew Bourne, M.Sc. (pending); B.Sc. (pending); Dip. Edu.
Conflict indicates that the system is in a process of obliteration (i.e. "breaking down") to which limits are boundless.
Limits are boundless?
That sounds like a nuther dissertation topic in itself.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace