0
   

Proofs of truths of Holy Quran

 
 
male
 
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 10:59 am
Non-Muslims claim that Quran is not the words of the God.

They have knowledge that before 1400 years man had not knowledge of science as he has today but what Holy Quran said 1400 years before, science is discovering that today. Is this not a proof that Holy Quran is the words of God.

For some instances read the following links.

http://www.religionsonline.info/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=149&PN=1

http://www.religionsonline.info/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=150&PN=1
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,668 • Replies: 31
No top replies

 
CrazyDiamond
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 11:44 am
No it's not proof. Now prepare to be mauled.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 02:18 pm
Quote:

Non-Muslims claim that Quran is not the words of the God.

What of us 'non-muslims' that feel 'god' has no words whatsoever due to nonexistence?
Quote:

They have knowledge that before 1400 years man had not knowledge of science as he has today but what Holy Quran said 1400 years before, science is discovering that today. Is this not a proof that Holy Quran is the words of God.

No I will not chase your links because you are either too lazy or not fluent enough in english to form a cogent argument on your own.
Lets start with some evidence of fufilled predictions in the koran, as they relate to science.
Put up or..well you know the rest.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 02:19 pm
CrazyDiamond wrote:
No it's not proof. Now prepare to be mauled.


I cannot for the life of me imagine why you would think such a thing would happen here.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 02:21 pm
Male, i can think of few things so feeble in the way of "proof" as is entailed in coming to a web bulletin board with a post from a different web bulletin board . . . he said/she said . . .
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 02:43 pm
yawn. Gee, one religions bullshit is more accurate than another religions bullshit. Go figger
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 06:36 pm
But, in the link I looked at, even the info given by the pro Islam commentary inaccurately reflects the scientific information it is commenting upon.

Proof indeed!

Such nonsense.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 06:42 pm
hey , dont yell at me, I didnt write it.
0 Replies
 
Teperehmi
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 06:49 pm
A text can only be the "word of God" if the reader sees and feels it that way.

I will not say my beliefs on the issue in order to stay safe from stereotypes and attackures (don't think thats a word, but oh well) and other such stuff. But, I believe that if a person is deeply, deeply affected by something, such as a text, person, or place, so much to the point of changing his or her life around that experience, then yes, the person would truly believe that that text, person, or place was "from God".

Everything is a matter of opinion and until four apocalyptic horsemen ride forth or the earth is destroyed by a giant meteor or the world is swallowed bya giant turtle or whatever may be your beliefs, then nothing will be proven.

Period.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 11:50 am
And if male ever comes back to this board or thread, his response will be, "made you look!"
0 Replies
 
male
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 01:18 pm
Doktor S wrote:
What of us 'non-muslims' that feel 'god' has no words whatsoever due to nonexistence?


We shall discuss that in a sapare thread. I am talking about the truths of Holy Quran as described in those links.
0 Replies
 
male
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 01:21 pm
If any one thinks that the Holy Quran is not words of God and of some human, then try to make a single verse like 6666 verses in that. It has been challenged in Quran that no one will ever be able to do that.
0 Replies
 
male
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 01:37 pm
Read also http://www.religionsonline.info/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=130&PN=1
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 04:26 pm
THIS is your notion of "proof"?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 04:36 pm
well i'm convinced dlowan, surprised you're not

off to mosque tomorrow

damn sunday

well 6 days to wait

let you know how I get on
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 04:48 pm
Quote:
Now coming to the original question, why is a man allowed to have more than one wife?

2. The Qur'an is the only religious scripture in the world that says,"marry only one".

In earlier times, Christian men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no restriction on the number of wives. It was only a few centuries ago that the Church restricted the number of wives to one.


This is a quote from the link posted by male. I suspect he either missed the satire or is playing it with a straight face.
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 06:29 pm
Whoa...hmm...wonder what he's gonna say to that...
0 Replies
 
male
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 02:43 am
Acquiunk wrote:
Quote:
Now coming to the original question, why is a man allowed to have more than one wife?

2. The Qur'an is the only religious scripture in the world that says,"marry only one".

In earlier times, Christian men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no restriction on the number of wives. It was only a few centuries ago that the Church restricted the number of wives to one.


This is a quote from the link posted by male. I suspect he either missed the satire or is playing it with a straight face.


That is the most favorite method of non-Muslims to present a text with out context. If have read the article in full, this quotation has been explained in detail. Perhaps you just stopped here and copy some of that topic to mis-represent that.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 05:10 am
I dont think Muslims do satire Acquiunk.

Unlike Gilbert and George

http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/comment/story/0,,1691445,00.html
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 10:06 am
I'm not certain if it was Gilbert and George or Miss Widdcombe who was being satiric.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Proofs of truths of Holy Quran
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/17/2025 at 05:28:50