Setanta wrote:If Cyphercat wants to assume the mantle of tofu-eating clown and take umbrage, i have no problem with that.
Since it came only a couple of posts after I said that I loved Tofurky Jerky, it seemed to me the mantle was draped upon me in response to my declaration, but I didn't really take umbrage; I just responded. Plus, "tofu-eating clown" isn't that bad of an epithet, actually; if that were to be my other a2k nickname besides Pooky, that would be fine. It's pretty cute, really, except I don't like clowns much.
Setanta wrote:
Certainly soy beans have a lot of uses other than the making of tofu. Certainly feed lot cattle are a less than "holistic" and "organic" approach to getting meat--it were a good deal more problematic, though, to claim they damage the environment.
My point was and remains that people who eat tofu, while loudly proclaiming their dedication to the environment and macrobiotic superiority are self-deluded. I don't know if that includes Cyphercat or not. I also don't care.
I feel the same about people who'll down a fast food burger and say they care about the environment, since one of the biggest reasons the rainforest is being sacrificed is to raise cattle-- to name just one way that meat production harms the environment. In the states, it's well known (or should be) that factory farms are big fat polluters of waterways, etc.
Anyway, blah blah blah, I don't really care about this either; I just thought that was kind of an unwarranted bit of vitriol you came out with, and so I responded to it.