20
   

What produces RUTHLESS DICTATORS?

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 12:32 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
Walter and others scoff at it, and they say "who is John Ray," but when I read it, it makes alot of sense. If there are falsehoods in it, point it out, but mostly people dismiss it because it does not match their beliefs, not because they can point out obvious errors.


I've pointed out already the most striking errors: no idea about the German language (and culture).
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 12:35 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
I believe some of them at least saw Hitler as the lesser of the evils they had to choose from at that point in time, in terms of policies, as compared to even more socialistic possibilities. And I do not believe the capitalists had any truly conservative or perfect safe havens that had enough political strength for them to place their hopes in, so they chose what they thought offered them the best chances.


You should perhaps a bit about (German) history before you believe something.

Especially the archives of Krupp, Thyssen, Mannesmann et. al. are a great source (as re their publications about this period).
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 12:40 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Bottom line, nobody is going to coax me into agreeing with them if I don't based upon the information presented, simply for the sake of doing that. Nor am I going to be intimidated by the likes of cicerone imposter that makes it his job to name call all day long. Forget it. If that is all this forum is good for, then it perhaps is a waste of time.


Besides that you can't get High Sea's point(s), no-one 'forces' you to agree with an opinion - but just to accept FACTS. And (original) sources.


What bewilders me most - and always - is, why you use the very same arguments as the Neo-Nazis do to justify the NSDAP-period ....
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 12:49 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
Yes, I have hinted that, and also I will not use text book descriptions, I will use common sense okie reasoning. Before further explanation, although I won't totally rule out the possibility of a right wing dictatorship, it does appear to me to be a bit of an oxymoron.

... ... ...

I may not have written the above in the most perfect way to explain my opinion, but it is as close as I can get this evening. Its been a long day.



There are always some with some [strange] people with some abstruse ideas in this world, no matter how well or bad it is written.

You wrote your ideas quite understandable. But they are hard to follow and your conclusions unsupported by sources and evidence.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:24 am
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

....
Because it seems that you use "authoritarian" and "left-wing" pretty much as synonyms. Which would mean that right-wing dictatorships, by definition, cannot exist. Or that a totalitarian theocracy would be the same as a socialist dictatorship. At least that's what you have hinted at so far.

But maybe that's the thesis you're trying to propagate here: that right-wing dictatorships don't exist. .....

I have answered this yesterday evening, but this morning I would like to add this to it.

Actually, you are touching on a very basic and real belief of conservative or right wing idealogy, at least as I understand it in today's world, and I believe as other conservatives also understand it. That is, that we believe in freedom and responsibility of the individual, which in fact does run totally counter to the entire idea of totalitarianism, it cannot exist under a totalitarian. Think about it, the root word of totalitarian, or "total," indicates something about the whole or commonality, or collectivism. This strikes at the heart of the entire philosophy of conservative vs liberal collective ideas, which require the sacrifice of individual liberty at the feet of the common good, the good of the whole, commonality, and a government to administer all of that, which implies something about the "total" or totalitarian. It would not allow for the freedom or responsibility of individuality.

As conservative people, I think the vast majority of us really do believe in the American ideal of freedom and responsibility of the individual, as described by the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights says more about the protection of the individual from each other and from the government, than it does about the powers of government being protected. You see, I believe the Declaration of Independence clearly states that our individual rights are given to us by God, not man, not government. The government is only a tool to seek to help protect those freedoms and responsibilities as granted and endowed by our Creator. Every man deserves to have the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and we only have laws to protect those rights and to prevent us from taking those basic rights from others. We were never promised happiness or prosperity, only the pursuit of it. We should have equality of opportunity, but not equality of outcomes. Conservatism is based upon equality of opportunity, while liberalism is based upon the expectation and so-called invented right to the equality of outcome. When liberals use the term "social justice," this is often what they are talking about, it is equality of outcome.

Therefore liberalism or left wing idealogies by definition tend to gender more totalitarian, more Statist, more socialistic, more powerful central governments in order to pursue its ultimate goals, which is commonality, collectivism, and good of the "total." I do not believe there should be much argument about this, it seems intuitively obvious to me, and I think to most conservatives. True conservatives that is. I cannot speak for so-called conservatives or right wing idealogues in Germany in the 1930's. I think they were quite likely a totally different body of political thought. I think rather that this issue is better judged from today's perspective.

For all of the reasons stated above, I do not believe socialists or extreme leftists really understand the American dream, the grand American experiment, what it is to be truly American. They do not understand where individual rights and responsibilities extend to, and where the beginning of somebody else's nose is, as they should not seriously conflict, there should be an appropriate balance there. They are either knowingly or unknowingly seeking to roll back the freedoms of this country and revert back to some European models of socialism and or communism, which I believe have failed on many fronts throughout history. And I believe Hitler and Nazism, or Fascism were only misguided outgrowths or spinoffs of all of that failed portion of history in Europe, and the so-called conservative or right wing aspects of it cannot at all be likened to what we have had and what we strive for today in America. NO WAY. Hitler belonged to Europe, and he belonged to Germany, period.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:27 am
@okie,
I am saving this post of yours for posterity. It stands out from the crowd, as a detailed explanation for why you are the way you are, Okie: you define yourself and what you like as 'good' and other ideas, well - they are bad by definition. Right?

Cycloptichorn
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:33 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Actually, you are touching on a very basic and real belief of conservative or right wing idealogy, at least as I understand it in today's world, and I believe as other conservatives also understand it. That is, that we believe in freedom and responsibility of the individual, which in fact does run totally counter to the entire idea of totalitarianism, it cannot exist under a totalitarian. Think about it, the root word of totalitarian, or "total," indicates something about the whole or commonality, or collectivism. This strikes at the heart of the entire philosophy of conservative vs liberal collective ideas, which require the sacrifice of individual liberty at the feet of the common good, the good of the whole, commonality, and a government to administer all of that, which implies something about the "total" or totalitarian. It would not allow for the freedom or responsibility of individuality.

As conservative people, I think the vast majority of us really do believe in the American ideal of freedom and responsibility of the individual, as described by the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights says more about the protection of the individual from each other and from the government, than it does about the powers of government being protected. You see, I believe the Declaration of Independence clearly states that our individual rights are given to us by God, not man, not government. The government is only a tool to seek to help protect those freedoms and responsibilities as granted and endowed by our Creator. Every man deserves to have the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and we only have laws to protect those rights and to prevent us from taking those basic rights from others. We were never promised happiness or prosperity, only the pursuit of it. We should have equality of opportunity, but not equality of outcomes. Conservatism is based upon equality of opportunity, while liberalism is based upon the expectation and so-called invented right to the equality of outcome. When liberals use the term "social justice," this is often what they are talking about, it is equality of outcome.



Well, I believe that every country and nation has the right to create its own constitution.
I do think that nearly all modern constitutions are somehow a mirror of the French/USA constitutions.

Each culture/continent/country/nation is somewhat different - so it really would be stupid to make all and everyone equal under the US Declaration of Independence. (Besides that, not many believe that "individual rights are given to us by God" - that's something we had here when we had emperors, kings, dukes, princes and such.)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:33 am
Okie cannot understand the concept of liberal without assuming that it is "collectivist" (a pejorative which is a back-formation from communist collectives). Therefore, Okie can never understand what liberal originally meant, nor what it has meant since the term was first applied to politics in the late 1820s, early 1830s. In the simplistic and simple-minded world which Okie inhabits, conservative does equal "good," and liberal does equal "bad." The evidence of this thread is that no one will ever get through to Okie, and that he will reject any evidence which contradicts what it is that he wants to believe, despite any amount or quality of evidence to the contrary.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:35 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Thats fine with me. I am the way I am because of many things, just as you are. I grew up poor, raised by FDR Democrats. We had a culture of work, get up in the morning and milk the cows, but we as everyone else in the farming community were fiercely independent and self sufficient. Many of our neighbors came from Europe, that generation or only one or two generations removed, and I think they therefore all understood clearly the American dream, the right to succeed or fail. They also had a spirit of helping the neighbors, but individually, not by government.

I've had to work for every dime in my life, in fact I paid my own way through college. Therefore, I know people can succeed in this country if they live and work responsibly. If they don't, they may not, but it isn't up to the rest of us that do to pay them to sit around and complain, then vote for Obama to give them what they want.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:35 am
@okie,
okie, Today's right wing ideology is the party of 'no.' They will continue to fight against universal health care while approving the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with US taxpayer money. There is no logic in the right wing ideology; their goal is to defeat a benefit for all Americans while approving funding for wars in third world countries that sacrifices not only our military but also our treasure - and to help rebuild what we destroy in their country - as our country's infrastructure deteriorates.

You are all crazy in the head. That's not capitalism or socialism; it's idiocy.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:35 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
NO WAY. Hitler belonged to Europe, and he belonged to Germany, period.


Now that's again an interesting opinion. Why did Hitler "belong" to Germany?
Because he became a German citizen?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:36 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Okie cannot understand the concept of liberal without assuming that it is "collectivist" (a pejorative which is a back-formation from communist collectives). Therefore, Okie can never understand what liberal originally meant, nor what it has meant since the term was first applied to politics in the late 1820s, early 1830s. In the simplistic and simple-minded world which Okie inhabits, conservative does equal "good," and liberal does equal "bad." The evidence of this thread is that no one will ever get through to Okie, and that he will reject any evidence which contradicts what it is that he wants to believe, despite any amount or quality of evidence to the contrary.


What kills me, is the ease with which he rebuffs the gentle rebukes of his political allies. Like water off a duck's back.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:38 am
@okie,
You may have worked yourself through college, but you learned nothing! College education is meant to expand your knowledge, not shrink it.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:38 am
Yeah . . . it's pretty bad when people like Asherman and O'George tell him his thesis is full of **** and he still cannot accept it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:38 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
In the simplistic and simple-minded world which Okie inhabits, conservative does equal "good," and liberal does equal "bad." The evidence of this thread is that no one will ever get through to Okie, and that he will reject any evidence which contradicts what it is that he wants to believe, despite any amount or quality of evidence to the contrary.


That's the sad truth.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:39 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Thats fine with me. I am the way I am because of many things, just as you are. I grew up fairly poor, raised by FDR Democrats. We had a culture of work, get up in the morning and milk the cows, but we as everyone else in the farming community were fiercely independent and self sufficient. Many of our neighbors came from Europe, that generation or only one or two generations removed, and I think they therefore all understood clearly the American dream, the right to succeed or fail. They also had a spirit of helping the neighbors, but individually, not by government.


The poor, inner-city Houston neighborhood I grew up in had many of these folks as well; it's not a 'country' thing.

Quote:
I've had to work for every dime in my life, in fact I paid my own way through college.


Same here. In fact, I haven't had a three-week long vacation in over 15 years. And I'm pretty liberal. How does that square, for you?

Quote:
Therefore, I know people can succeed in this country if they live and work responsibly. If they don't, they may not, but it isn't up to the rest of us that do to pay them to sit around and complain, then vote for Obama to give them what they want.


I voted for Obama, but I'm not waiting for anyone to give me anything. Do you honestly believe that's what Obama voters are doing?

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:51 am
Sorry fellas, I don't think like the rest of you. But thankfully, at least so far, America does not have collectivist thought, and I believe that I understand what America is all about and I will speak up to try to hold forth the principles that I believe in.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:56 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

I voted for Obama, but I'm not waiting for anyone to give me anything. Do you honestly believe that's what Obama voters are doing?

Cycloptichorn

Obama's entire belief system is that we all must pitch in to give other people something, pay their way. It is clear he is pushing us backward toward some kind of European model of socialism or fascism, wherein the government dictates everything and will try to spread the wealth around and bring about social justice or equality of outcome.

Surely you know this, cyclops? Either you favor that, or you are an unknowing dupe? I think you are too smart to be unknowing, but I can't be sure.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 09:57 am
@okie,
Quote:
It is clear he is pushing us backward toward some kind of European model of socialism or fascism


I would think it is clear he is pushing us back toward some kind of middle eastern form of caring promoted by a Jew 2000 years ago before the Romans got wise to it and killed him.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Sep, 2009 10:01 am
@Cycloptichorn,
okie still doesn't realize that most of us born during the depression were poor. He thinks his background and environment are somehow unique, and still fails to realize the facts.

okie also fails to understand what this country is all about; he doesn't understand what it means to be an American, because he fears socialism in our capitalistic, democratic republic, that have succeeded as no country before it. He still can't accept that the American people elected our president and congressional representatives through the election process, and this time the democrats won both the presidency and congress. He doesn't want to accept this reality.

All okie has done on these threads are fear-mongering, lies, and innuendos that Obama will transform this country into a communist state. His inferences are usually based on wrong information and conclusions about history and the current state of our country.

I just wonder how many "conservatives" there are in this country that think like okie? With all those birthers and death panel believers, there are just too many!~



0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 08:28:17