You did so . . . you just now pondered my comment, and were defeated by its just condemnation . . .
Setanta wrote:That sentence was not fabulous, it was merely pedestrian . . . and i intend to report you to the management for being agreeable . . .
As a self proclamed historian (histrion?) you certainly know what "delator" means.
It is always easy to spot one who is feigning a quality he does not posess. Francis' attempt above to 'go for the jugular' was obviously strained and unlike him. Certainly the effort on his part makes it clear that he tried hard and that I succeeded in "getting to him" in my earlier post. However, he just can't deliver thr truly mean-spirited quality required for this to be believable.
I have the same intrinsic limitations, however through superior concentration, and imitation of masters like Setanta and dlowan, was able to bring it off
"At least I refuse to ponder such ill-minded comments from canine individuals.."
Francis, your Gallic taste leaves much to be desired; at first, I thought you were walking your dog. Then I realized it was your date!!!
Setanta wrote:...and were defeated by its just condemnation . . .
The contention of the justness of your personal condemnation of my statement is a mere demonstration of the silliness of your self praised arrogance.
You need more work to be credible..
I can think of few absurdities which rise to the level of Tries Too Hard claiming to have realized anything . . .
dlowan wrote:" I just can not stand your pityful attempts to be jocous this time."
Fabulous sentence!!!!
.
I don't know why you say that. I didn't like it.
George, it was my intent..
Full of pity as I am in regard to the failing jocosity of (I gather, not reading back) Georgeob, I must claim exception to his statement about Francis' lack of mean-spirited quality. He must have a dab of meanspiritness somewhere, perhaps in his vestigial little toe.
Francis wrote:George, it was my intent..
I kow that ! I'm arguing with dlowan now.
And, as I noted above, it was a feeble and strained attempt at a Setanta-like hostile reaction.
Tryagain wrote:Francis, your Gallic taste leaves much to be desired; at first, I thought you were walking your dog. Then I realized it was your date!!!
You're weird, Try, or blind...
Osso, do you have something against my present, though vestigial, little toes?
georgeob1 wrote:dlowan wrote:" I just can not stand your pityful attempts to be jocous this time."
Fabulous sentence!!!!
.
I don't know why you say that. I didn't like it.
Well, I suppose one must have full mastery of the subtleties of the English language to be able to enjoy creative, or accidental, riffs upon it, such as Francis' effort.
There, there, George.
georgeob1 wrote: I'm arguing with dlowan now.
That's all you can do, attacking those kind little lagomorphs...
I am not familiar personally, Francis, with your little toes, and you well know that. I do find it likely that they would be good places for your meanspiritness to sequester itself. Do you question my judgement, or judgment, as the case may be?
Yes, Osso, I question your judgment. Why accuse those gentle little toes of being the den of such evil feelings?
Francis wrote:georgeob1 wrote: I'm arguing with dlowan now.
That's all you can do, attacking those kind little lagomorphs...
It is true, unkind words don't come naturally to me. But that rabbit was takig too much pleasure in an awkward riff. (I did have to look up 'lagomorph')
Osso is another one who just can't feign real meanness.
Toes, shmoes . . . the entire Franciscan foot, the seat of his intellect, is the cultprit in his ludicrous attempts to dispute with those here, among whom even the lagomorphs shame him . . .
ossobuco wrote:I am not familiar personally, Francis, with your little toes, and you well know that.
Could she be seeking an invitation??
