I it take from the evidence here that you offer advice based upon your hard-won experience of having done so repeatedly . . .
I will defend to the death your right to my opinion. I used to think that you were a big pain in the neck. Now I have a much lower opinion of you. No! Lower than that.
Tries too hard wrote:I used to think . . .
It is well that this was a thought placed in the past . . . there currently is no evidence for your use of the verb "to think" . . .
Fairy nuff, I walked into that one. Ouch! I should have seen that a coming, chalk one up to the bad guys. Can't talk to you right now; tell me, where will you be in ten years time?
Hmm! Nobody here to disagree with...
Oh, the disagreeable antipodean bunny!
Are you you in your usual grumpy mood?
What "usual grumpy mood"?
I am an angel from heaven as to temperament...
Probably from Bunnies heaven which means a hell of a country.
But very predictable response for the sake of disagreeing.
Can"t you find something more original?
Francis, you go too far in a disagreeable insult to a lady. In fact, you're acquitting yourself in a way that no jury ever would.
Curious thread - deliberate attempts to be disagreeable on the part of posters who come by it quite naturally, and who exercise the skill regularly on other threads.
Francis, however, is all form and no substance - too abstract and formal: he lacks the instinctively viscous qualities of (say) Setanta, who can annoy merely by saying Hello.
I never indulge in such devices.
A patent lie . . . 'tis the closest you can come to rhetorical skill . . .
How could you possibly tell ?
As always, George, your judgemental innate (and inane) skills are at work here. But as always you are missing the point as you can not differentiate a mere lack of mastering of English language from a real ability of disagreeing.
Abstracts seem to be more powerful notions than those you are commonly used to.
That's why you can not see me in the threads you attend. I just can not stand your pityful attempts to be jocous this time.
You could, you simply refuse to do so . . . more evidence of your Ibero-Gallic contrariness . . .
dlowan wrote:Yes.
But not for you.
It would be so lame you better keep it unspoken..
" I just can not stand your pityful attempts to be jocous this time."
Fabulous sentence!!!!
Er, ahem.....back to our usual programming....sorry....
That sentence was not fabulous, it was merely pedestrian . . . and i intend to report you to the management for being agreeable . . .
Setanta wrote:You could, you simply refuse to do so . . . more evidence of your Ibero-Gallic contrariness . . .
At least I refuse to ponder such ill-minded comments from canine individuals..
