Liberal Hypocrisy about Intelligent Design

Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 05:02 am
@cicerone imposter,
There are some bus ervices I believe. You didnt have a rental car? Hmmmmmm. when you get to the hotel, check with the concierge and get the SEPTA lines information I think theres some trains like the R-4 or R-5 (The SEPTA lines all use the pefix "R" to denote their routes)
0 Replies
Reply Tue 24 May, 2011 04:49 am
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

I have been thinking this and am suprised that this has not been brought up.

Intelligent Design is Ebonics for science.

Ironically the liberals who support Ebonics as an alternative to English are unwilling to support Intelligent Design as an alternative to Science.

The theory in Ebonics is that a cultural group was not brought up with the grammatical constructs of standard English. It was therefore unreasonable to expect them to use "correct" English (at least not right away)-- and what is correct English anyway.

Intelligent design has a cultural group that is that lacks the logic and reason of standard science. It is therefore unreasonable to expect them to use "correct" science-- and what is correct science anyway.

So what of it. Is there anyone who supports both Ebonics and intelligent Design?

Isn't it inconsistant to support one without the other?
ID has utterly been debunked, all it's arguments beign counterargumented in a major lawsuit.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Intelligent Design - Question by giujohn
What is Intelligent Design? - Discussion by RexRed
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Bed Bug/Parasite Plant Theory - Question by TeePee38
dna worlds - Discussion by Syamsu
DD VERSUS EVOLUTION - Discussion by Setanta
The Evil of god - Discussion by giujohn
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/31/2023 at 05:40:03