survival of the fitt/rich.est {My theorey}

Che: Perhaps your theory should be titled "Survival of the Fattest." It seems your idea is a sort of reformulation of Spencer's Social Evolution. He applied Darwin's theory to society; not surprisingly, Social Evolution, among other things, lent legitimacy to rule by dominant elites (i.e., the upper class).

However, you don't really show how this competition leads to a loss or waste of labor. You also don't really show how the accumulation of money contributes to the survival of the wealthy. It certainly is the fuel of the engine that perpetuates the dominance of the wealthy elite.

I highly doubt these are quotes from Darwin, as they do not make sense, have poor grammar, and contradict evolution. Your theory on money has no logical grounding, either.