Reply
Tue 15 Nov, 2005 05:36 am
For a period of some two hundred years America had an every moving new frontier. One of the appeals of this ever-present frontier was the sense that there was always a place for the rugged individualist. A place existed for the individual who was enthused about the prospect of uninhibited growth where each individual could test his or her capacity to be all they could be. No one had an edge over the other person beyond character and motivation.
Darwin's theory teaches us that mating and reproduction is the means whereby the species adapted to a changing environment and thereby created the possibility for survival of the species. Generally speaking the human species stops this procreation process before the age of forty. Biological evolution provides no means for adaptation in our species beyond forty years of age.
Human instrumental rationality has created a technology that continually increases the longevity of individuals of our species. Instrumental rationality is the ability to determine and execute the best means for reaching an established goal. We have determined the goal of ever extending life to be a valuable goal and are constantly extending human longevity.
Simultaneously with an extended life span we are continually shortening the social value of longevity. Like the rest of our commodities we have a throwaway culture for long-lived persons. Our society seems to mimic biological evolution in placing forty years as the end of adaptability concern. Biological evolution terminates concern for those beyond the age of reproduction and our culture terminates concern for those beyond the age of commodity production.
Biological adaptation has abandoned us after forty, our instrumental rationality is responding to our unexamined desire to prolong life; how do we mange to survive as a species if we do not find a rational means to engage this challenge? The challenge is to create the sociatal value of human life after forty.
Where is the ever-moving frontier of expectations for the man or woman beyond the age of forty? Is age beyond forty to remain a throw-away social value?
You could consult Simon Raven on the subject of women over 40.I haven't the nerve to quote him.I don't recall him saying anything about men though.
The last I heard of him is that he had entered upon a monastic lifestyle and died therein.
http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/21/apr03/raven.htm
It has some interest.