Hello Pragmatic.
It does seem odd that our world seems to have so many people desiring small, homogenized countries. We have to wonder if that is that the best way for the world. Do we aim towards many little countries banded together by similar interests or gigantic countries federally managing a lot of separate states? Sometimes I think it would be better for the United States if the USA broke up into individual states and each got a vote in the UN. Maybe China should do the same thing.
Goodfielder -- You are closer to this country. I was hoping you'd know more and could explain what is currently going on.
This is what I know... prior to Western colonization, Sri Lanka was divided into kingdoms for the Tamils and the Sinhalese. The Tamils fought for freedom but when the island received it and became "Sri Lanka" the Sinhalese got all the power. Since then, the Sinhalese, being more numerous have made strong rulings and discrimination against the Tamils, similar, it seems to me, to the historical actions by Americans against Native Americans, including forcing Tamil children to learn Sinhalese, etc. or the actions of Australians against the Aborigines.
Of course that sounds unfair and seems racist. Religion is also mixed up in it.
LTTE wrote:On 15th of July 1979, after enacting the prevention of Terrorism Act (far more draconian than the notorius Terrorism Act of South Africa) and having declared an Emergency in Jaffna and also having despatched the military to the Tamil north under the command of Brigadier Weeratunga, J.R. Jayewardene, the President of Sri Lanka gave a special directive to the Brigadier in these words: " It will be your duty to eliminate in accordance with the laws of the land the menace of terrorism in all it forms from the Island and more especially from the Jaffna District.
Here's an article from the
ADNKIQuote:SRI LANKA: TAMIL TIGER BOYCOTT TO HELP PRIME MINISTER IN PRESIDENTIAL POLL (Nov. 10th)With just one week to go until presidential elections in Sri Lanka analysts say a possible boycott by Tamil Tiger rebels will tilt the balance towards the candidate from the ruling United People's Front Alliance (UPFA), prime minister Mahinda Rajapakse. The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have publicly announced they were not interested in the November 17 polls.
(The ceasefire came in) February 2002 after a two-decade long insurgency claimed more than 60,000 lives. <...> violence has increased this year with the number of political killings nearing 200, according to the Scandinavian monitors who oversee the ceasefire. (and) ...LTTE has lost sympathy with the international community following the August 12 assassination of the Sri Lankan foreign minister Lakshman Kadirgamar )
Prime minister Rajapakse is fighting the presidential election (ie. a candidate) on an agenda based on taking a tough line with the Tigers.
The other front-runner in the race is Ranil Wickramasinghe, who became Sri Lanka's prime minister in 2001 and negotiated the ceasefire with the Tamil rebels. He lost power in 2004 when President Chandrika Kumaratunga called early elections. Whoever wins the election will be taking over (from current President) Kumaratunga.
... "I do not want the country split into two. We will not give the Tigers their homeland," says Sirisena (a rural farmer), who had never travelled to the north-east of the country.
...56-year-old Margerita Perera, a Christian from Moratuwa, a Colombo suburb, says her vote is determined by religion. "We fear that there might be a restriction on the freedom of religion if Rajapakse wins. ... referring to the controversial anti-conversion bill
Regarding the Anti-Conversion bill and religious affiliations affecting the elections in Sri Lanka:
Hindustan Times, Nov 14th -- Key Issues in Lanka Election
Quote:The Tamils, whether Sri Lankan Tamils of the North East, or the Indian Origin Tamils in the rest of Sri Lanka, fear that they will be discriminated against by a Rajapaksa regime. ... This is not because Rajapaksa is himself undesirable, (he is personally secular and also much loved) but because he could become a puppet in the hands of his allies, the JVP and JHU, which are perceived to be anti-Tamil.
The Christian minority's bugbear is the anti-conversion bill, which the SLFP government tried to enact at the instigation of the JHU. ...
The Muslims too are worried about the new "political Buddhism", spearheaded by the JHU. They resent the setting up Buddha's statues in Muslim villages in East Sri Lanka.
In the end... maybe the real fight is racism:
http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/elango.html
I honestly don't know... I was hoping some other more informed people would discuss this and I could sit back and learn.