D'artagnan wrote:So who the hell is Furnish? On the faculty of Georgia Perimeter College? I'm sure the Islamic Studies department there is quite impressive...
As opposed to yourself. Faculty within the Ivy League? Brown, Princeton, perhaps. Oh, that's right D'artagnan, web pundit extrodinaire.
Freedom4free, while I can understand that you do not agree with the man, but the points you bring to reject him are flimsy at best:
freedom4free wrote:For example, he begins to cross the line on the fifth where he makes the point that the Crusaders never started the Crusades. He suggests they are actually just responding to an invasion of the Holy Lands. True. But I'm sure it is hoped that one doesn't remember that this invasion took place several hundred years before. Certainly he isn't going to remind you. Nor the fact that since that time, Christians, Muslims and other religious groups have been living peacefully side by side. Well, as peacefully as one can expect members of the Abrahamic faiths to live. I realize that isn't saying much, but......
If you reread the 5th myth, the writer in no place mentions "responding to an invasion of the Holy Land". He does say that that was the first time Europeans got around to taking the fight to the Middle East. If you are disputing that fact then you must rewrite a large portion of history to try to erase Muslim provocation, invasion, and instigation against the European states. (Think Charles Martel, Freedom). Coupled with your absurdly pedantic mention of the Hollywood-esque notion that "Christians and Muslims lived peacefully side by side" (I imagine you must have recently watched 'Kingdom of Heaven'), and I don't think you are in much of a position to try to refute.
This whole point is obtuse and really kind of funny. Made even more humorous by your mention of the writer committing a non sequitur. I can't tell if you are making a point, or just regurgitating his speech, forgot to include your point and then decided to include a retarded reference to some illogical mathematic counter. Perhaps you should consider rewriting that whole post. Just a thought.
P.S. What's with the "freedom4free" name? You are either trying incredibly hard to be an "anti-patriot" (a bit of an attempt to self-define), or you just foolishly believe that it is internauts like you who keep the war from your shores, the drugs from your neighborhoods, the looters from your disaster zones, the beheading terrorists from your safely blogging self.