Who is Judge Alito?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_A._Alito,_Jr.
Samuel A. Alito Jr. (born April 1, 1950) is a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On October 31, 2005, he was nominated by President George W. Bush to the position of Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Some claim he is ideologically similar to United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and nickname him "Scalito." This nickname has been seen by some Republicans as ethnically insensitive. [1]
Alito and wife, Martha, live in West Caldwell, New Jersey. He has two children: a son in college and a daughter in high school.
With the announced retirement of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in 2005, Alito was widely reported as being narrowly passed-over as her replacement by the Bush Administration, having been edged-out by close personal Bush aide and confidant, Harriet Miers. Miers's nomination was withdrawn on October 27, 2005 following opposition from conservative Republicans and some Democrats. Shortly thereafter, on October 31, 2005, the Bush administration announced that it had selected Alito as its nominee for O'Connor's position.
Alito was born in Trenton, New Jersey on April 1, 1950. He graduated from Princeton University with an A.B. in 1972, and went to Yale Law School, where he earned a J.D. in 1975.
Career
From 1976 to 1977, Alito clerked for the Honorable Leonard I. Garth of the Third Circuit.
From 1981 to 1985 he was assistant to Solicitor General Rex E. Lee, and was deputy assistant to the Attorney General Edwin Meese from 1985 to 1987. Alito then served a brief stint as U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey.
Alito was nominated by George H. W. Bush on February 20, 1990 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On April 27, 1990, the United States Senate confirmed him. His chambers are in Newark, New Jersey.
He served in The United States Army Reserve and was honorably discharged as a captain.
He is known for his conservative views and pointedly written rulings, in the mold of Justice Scalia. Women's rights groups point to a Pennsylvania law that he voted to uphold that required women to tell their husbands before having an abortion. The Supreme Court struck down the law in 1992.
George W. Bush nominated Alito for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States on October 31, 2005. If he is confirmed by the Senate, Alito will be the twelfth Catholic ever to serve on the Supreme Court, and the fifth on the current Court (along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas).
Case history
Alito wrote the majority opinion [2] in ACLU v. Schundler, 168 F.3d 92 (3d Cir. 1999), holding that a holiday display on city property did not violate the Establishment Clause because it included secular symbols, such as a large plastic Santa Claus, in addition to religious symbols. Such mixed displays had previously been held constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. The ACLU argued that a previous city display that was ruled unconstitutional because it lacked secular symbols colored the purpose of the new display. Alito wrote:
"As our prior discussion of Lynch and Allegheny County illustrates, the Supreme Court's decisions regarding holiday displays have been marked by fine line-drawing, and therefore it is not easy to determine whether particular displays satisfy the Court's standards. Under these circumstances, the mere fact that city officials miscalculate and approve a display that is found by the federal courts to cross over the line is hardly proof of the officials' bad faith."
A dissenting opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 947 F.2d 682 (3d Cir. 1991), arguing that a Pennsylvania law that required women seeking abortions to inform their husbands should have been upheld. As Judge Alito reasoned, "[t]he Pennsylvania legislature could have rationally believed that some married women are initially inclined to obtain an abortion without their husbands' knowledge because of perceived problems ?- such as economic constraints, future plans, or the husbands' previously expressed opposition ?- that may be obviated by discussion prior to the abortion." Chief Justice Rehnquist dissent from the Supreme Court's 5-4 [corrected] decision striking down the spousal notification provision of the law quoted Judge Alito's dissent and expressed support for Judge Alito's reasoning.
Granted the habeas corpus claim of an African-American defendant who sought to introduce evidence that a juror made a racist remark after the jury reached its verdict. (Williams v. Price, 2003)
A majority opinion in Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233 (3d Cir. 1993)
A majority opinion in Saxe v. State College Area School District, 240 F.3d 200 (3d Cir. 2001) [3], holding that the public school district's anti-harassament policy was unconstitutionally overbroad and therefore violated First Amendment guarantees of free speech.
A majority opinion in Shore Regional High School Board of Education v. P.S., 381 F.3d 194 (3d Cir. 2004) [4] reinstating an administrative law judge's ruling in favor of parents who claimed the school system's failure to protect their child from bullying justified their placing him in a different high school.
A majority opinion in Williams v. Price, 343 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2003)
A dissenting opinion in Homar v. Gilbert, 89 F.3d 1009 (3d Cir. 1996).
A dissenting opinion in Sheridan v. Dupont, 74 F.3d 1439 (3d Cir. 1996) (en banc).
A concurring opinion in Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer, 220 F.3d 127 (3rd Cir. 2000) in which Judge Alito recognized that a New Jersey law banning "partial-birth abortions" was unconstititional in light of the recent Supreme Court case of Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 120 S.Ct. 2597, 147 L.Ed.2d 743 (2000).
External links
Profile from Law.com
US News profile
SCOTUSblog analysis
Washington Post Profile
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_A._Alito%2C_Jr."