1
   

The Centre Of Our Existence!

 
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 08:39 pm
Now you really look like Wicked Wanda! Wow, how seductive.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 08:52 pm
I sense some sort of frustration in this thread.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 08:53 pm
I sense something, not sure what it is but I don't know where the topic went.
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 09:00 pm
All right, I am distracting. I am exiting.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 09:03 pm
exciting or excited?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 09:04 pm
lol!!!

NEVERMIND! Sorry!
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jan, 2006 09:05 pm
Since I ain't contributing...
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 06:05 am
it's the nucleus?
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 08:22 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

With all due respect here, you did call those of us you call Bible Thumpers fools. You expected nothing in retort?


I actually expected nothing by way of 'revenge'.

Although I guess I should have.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 08:50 am
Questioner wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

With all due respect here, you did call those of us you call Bible Thumpers fools. You expected nothing in retort?


I actually expected nothing by way of 'revenge'.

Although I guess I should have.

Maybe she ran out of cheeks?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 06:37 pm
I got a cheek for ya! Normally a person only has 2 to offer....but I'm willing to accomodate the persistent.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 08:49 pm
ok bend over.
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 10:35 pm
Doktor S wrote:
Questioner wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

With all due respect here, you did call those of us you call Bible Thumpers fools. You expected nothing in retort?


I actually expected nothing by way of 'revenge'.

Although I guess I should have.

Maybe she ran out of cheeks?


What's this mean?
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 10:59 pm
If you don't get it, it wasn't intended for you.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:51 pm
Doktor S wrote:
ok bend over.


On second thought...you seem a little too anxious. I'll pass.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:52 pm
Sad
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Jan, 2006 12:14 am
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Jan, 2006 12:51 am
Oh, I get it.

I was checking.
0 Replies
 
lezzles
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 09:28 am
Doktor S wrote:
I don't see it because there is nothing to see.

I don't share your fantasy world. I deal in reality.


I have just been reading through this thread and I have to admit I find it very amusing that a self-proclaimed Satanist makes statements like these.

1. If he considers belief in God living in a fantasy world that makes Satan a fantasy too. Therefore he worships a fantasy.

2. If he deals in reality, ie, he considers Satan to be real, therefore God is real too. He can't have it both ways. Rolling Eyes

I don't mean this as an insult, but I cannot give much credence to someone who chooses the name of a Nazi war criminal as his title and as his avatar, Charles Manson, one of the most evil men to have walked the earth. I'm not trying to be nasty - he can choose to be who or what he wants and to worship whoever he wants. It just doesn't inspire me personally to follow his brand of logic.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2006 11:45 am
Quote:

1. If he considers belief in God living in a fantasy world that makes Satan a fantasy too. Therefore he worships a fantasy.

You are working under a fundamental misunderstanding of what you are talking about. Satanists do not share the christian paradigm.
Quote:

2. If he deals in reality, ie, he considers Satan to be real

non sequiter, strawman.
Quote:

I don't mean this as an insult, but I cannot give much credence to someone who chooses the name of a Nazi war criminal as his title

Uhhh..pardon?
Quote:

and as his avatar, Charles Manson, one of the most evil men to have walked the earth

There is no 'good and evil'
Quote:

I'm not trying to be nasty - he can choose to be who or what he wants and to worship whoever he wants. It just doesn't inspire me personally to follow his brand of logic.

Logic works better when it isn't being used with false premises.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 09:15:22