1
   

Are Monarchies passe in today's world? Should they be?

 
 
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 05:39 pm
Are Monarchies passe in today's world? Why do their populations continue to support them in many countries? What about monarchs in the Middle East in addition to the chiefs in today's tribal-based societies? BBB--------------------------------

Japan's Monarchy Searches for Its Human Face
By Natalie Obiko Pearson Associated Press Writer
Published: Mar 30, 2003

TOKYO (AP) - Emperor Akihito has never seemed more human, nor the palace over which he reigns more open. As he recovers from a prostate cancer operation, doctors have openly discussed details of his surgery, the disease and his prognosis, which they say is excellent. Just 15 years ago, the public wasn't even told that Akihito's father, Emperor Hirohito, had cancer until he died.

The public handling of Akihito's illness offers a sharp contrast with the centuries of closely guarded secrecy that surrounded royal lives spent in quiet seclusion behind moats and palace walls. But while the newfound openness has been welcomed by many, all is not well with the world's oldest royal family.

Stripped of most of its official powers after World War II, Japan's imperial household has long struggled to define its modern, mostly symbolic role. But it is becoming increasingly irrelevant to the young. And with no male heirs to take over after the next generation, it is facing its most serious succession crisis in centuries.

Attitudes toward Japan's imperial household have undergone a marked
transformation over the past 50 years. Until the country's defeat ended World War II in 1945, heavy propaganda by the government led Japanese to revere Akihito's father as a living god. Today, young urbanites don't seem to care much one way or the other.

"Talk about the imperial household with my friends? No, never," said
Satoshi Takahashi, a 27-year-old office employee.

In a February poll by the newspaper Asahi, 56 percent of the people
surveyed said they felt "in touch with the imperial household," a rise of 12 percentage points from a similar poll in 1978. But only 21 percent of those in their early 20s said they felt that way, and 76 percent in the group felt they were "out of touch."

Public opinion polls also suggest that young people who do give any thought to the monarchy feel it probably needs to move into closer step with the values of the rest of society. A major test of the monarchy's openness to change has emerged in its succession crisis.

No boy has been born to the imperial family since the 1960s, but a law written after World War II specifies that only men can assume the throne. Polls have consistently shown strong support for a revision to allow an empress to reign, particularly following the birth of Crown Prince
Naruhito's only child, Princess Aiko, a little over a year ago.

But while many agree there could be much to gain by allowing the
Japanese monarchy to update itself, few seem to be willing to lead the effort - least of the all the imperial family itself. The imperial family has taken no explicit position on the issue, deferring instead to the government, which has shown little interest in making any changes.

"To debate the emperor system is still very much taboo," said Hiroshi
Takahashi, an author of numerous books on the imperial household and a lecturer at Tokyo's Kokugakuin University.

The problem, in large part, has to do with the historical legacy of the brutal war fought in Hirohito's name that still looms over the Japanese throne. Following Japan's defeat, Hirohito renounced his divine status and
became a ceremonial "symbol" of the nation in compliance with U.S.
occupation forces' demands to separate state and religion. The postwar palace has been stripped of its political powers, and giving the monarchy a more significant function is a suggestion that is routinely rejected by a public still wary of the wartime precedent.

The religious issue has been even more delicate. The emperor quietly remains the head priest of Japan's indigenous Shinto religion. In a "private" capacity, he performs the ancient rituals that trace his lineage to the sun goddess Amaterasu - mythical progenitor of the imperial line and Japanese people. Few politicians want to challenge this sensitive balance.

"Politically and economically, things have really stalled. It's simply not the right climate to be debating imperial issues," said Isao Tokoro, an expert on the imperial system at Kyoto Sangyo University. "They are not seen as Japan's immediate problems."

Other experts stress that important changes are under way - if slowly.
Kenneth Ruoff, director of Portland State University's Center for Japanese Studies and author of "The People's Emperor," noted that Akihito's wife, Empress Michiko, traveled alone to Switzerland in September to attend a children's' book festival. It was her first solo overseas trip in 43 years of marriage.

"It was hugely important step," he said, arguing that it could set the groundwork for a future reigning empress by getting Japan accustomed to a more high-profile role for its imperial women. But Ruoff said the monarchy could be doing more.

"If this institution is going to exist, why not reach out to the very people who need its prestige the most - the Ainu, the Koreans and society's untouchables," he said, referring to ethnic minorities in Japanese society who continue to face considerable discrimination.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,857 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 05:53 pm
I hope, British/Australian/Canadian/New Zealand/Dutch A2K-ers will not get insulted (I do not mean to insult anyone), but IMO, in the First World monarchy is nothing beyond useless, obsolete and expensive toy, and it permits to a small group of people to conduct parasitic way of life on expense of the taxpayers.
In the Third World (except, maybe, Thailand and Jordan), monarchy is tantamount to dictatorship. In fact, some countries claiming being republics (Iraq, Syria) are actually absolute hereditary monarchies.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 06:10 pm
I agree with steissd but note that in some cases the current alternative to monarchy is not very desireable.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 06:54 pm
Absolutely agree. I believe that Shah Muhammed Reza Pehlevi is a better alternative for Iran than the "democratically" elected president Sheik-ul-Islam Mohammed Khatami. Likewise, I prefer Juan Carlos I in Spain to Generalissimo Francisco Franco.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 06:56 pm
I prefer the house of Saud to the extremists that think like Osama. But prefer that in the long term that monarchy end.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 07:08 pm
Ditto.
0 Replies
 
frolic
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 04:25 am
steissd wrote:
I hope, British/Australian/Canadian/New Zealand/Dutch A2K-ers will not get insulted (I do not mean to insult anyone), but IMO, in the First World monarchy is nothing beyond useless, obsolete and expensive toy, and it permits to a small group of people to conduct parasitic way of life on expense of the taxpayers.


I couldn't agree more! Our prince Laurent gets married in a few weeks. The whole celebration costs us about 300.000 euro. And we all know they got a few billion on their bankaccount. They are leechers of society.

There is also a famous story in Belgian history. In the beginning of the '80 the Belgian Frank, our currency, had to be devaluated. But the king knew that in advance, so he transferred all his maney out of Belgium. That is fraud! But since our king has immunity nobody can prosecute him.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2003 05:57 am
Monarchies are a joke. Particularly the British one.
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2004 02:48 pm
steissd wrote:
I hope, British/Australian/Canadian/New Zealand/Dutch A2K-ers will not get insulted (I do not mean to insult anyone), but IMO, in the First World monarchy is nothing beyond useless, obsolete and expensive toy, and it permits to a small group of people to conduct parasitic way of life on expense of the taxpayers.

I am not a real supporter of our Dutch Royal Family, but eventually they are more than just 'useless' in the eyes of many Dutchmen. For many people they represent a sort of national pride, and eventually they are the ones who also represent us outside the Netherlands on several occasions. Call it nationalistic, but people are strangely 'proud' of the Royal Family. They are as Dutch as wooden shoes, windmills, gay marriage and softdrugs. That does not take away though they are parasites that feed on our taxes Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Are Monarchies passe in today's world? Should they be?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 05:24:03