iknow wrote:i agree with what you said so far. however, you didn't completely answer his question, just said what was good or bad for each party. in terms of the collective good or bad, which is it? was overall more harm done or more good? is it more disturbing for the guy to get something stolen or the girl to live? we don't know wcause we dont' have all the facts. if she only lived for another day probably it woud ahve been better for the guy to keep the bread. cause it would be very upsetting in his cofidence,... maybe you get the idea it could be anything go in any direction. its a very hard thing to judge good and bad usually.
Hmmm... good point; I hadn't thought of that. But... well... I'm speaking generally. I mean, it's generally "bad" to murder someone, but in some [extreme] cases, it could be considered "good". So, yeah, the bread thing COULD have been a bad thing to do, but
in most cases I'd consider it morally acceptable. [Again, not necessarily
good, but not completely bad.]