The patriarchy vs the matriarchy

I don’t babble Frank.You are just unaware.

I am not the one who is "unaware." You are unaware that you babble.

Frank.I have clearly explained the mechanical workings of how I suggest that brain works and the full logic philosophy it adopts.I have also given a science to back this up which makes perfect sense.

I don’t babble at all.I have been perfectly clear.

I'd never serve a line up like that to Frank. He's got a masterful backhand.

How consciousness interfaces with the mechanical brain and its FULL logic has to be treated as a completely separate item in my opinion.

I think if you break every conceivable possibility into every conceivable possibility, you will be fractal-ized into knowing nothing while being hyper aware of everything with no system for developing any sort of knowing.



I just channeled my inner J10. It was a full and empty experience.

I don’t think I am a biological computer which only gives possibilities on the big questions.

I just suggest how it operates and I have provided the science.

Have you met anyone who agrees with you or is everybody unaware?

I think we make the mistake of defining the matriarchy as women having the power, but power is alien to the matriarchy. Power is a patriarchal concept.

The matriarchy it's based on the physical with the mind supporting the physical. It's about balance. In the early Neolithic, you had matriarchal cultures in Eastern Europe and Mesopotamia. These were goddess-based cultures that fully embraced invention and discovery. It was the nomadic patriarchal cultures that came in and destroyed the goddess, literally destroyed the cultures and replaced them with a power-based patriarchy. I think Crete was the last holdout of a matriarchal system.

The goddess still survives, unconsciously at least, in Catholicism. The Madonna functions as the goddess, and many people refer to her as the "mother of God," although others would consider that blasphemy. I think protestantism lacks a goddess figure at all, though I may be wrong.

It's an interesting concept anyway. One of the best books I've read on the subject is The Myth of the Goddess: Evolution of an Image by Ann Baring. It traces the evolution of religions, especially the goddess religions.

When it comes to consciousness then I would suggest that not many are aware.

Not when it comes to consciousness.

Awareness of consciousness is important.

Awareness sits above consciousness and is completely separate from it as I have continually suggested.

You do not make anything perfectly clear on purpose.

Accidentally you occasionally show that you are incapable (or unwilling) to be clear...perfectly or otherwise.

Ignorance is bliss.

Jasper is blissful. I'll give him that.

Frank.I have clearly explained my suggestions for the workings of the brain.

Its a biological computer organ Frank …..computers utilise FULL 0,0…0,1…1,0…1,1 binary logic.They don’t operate very well with half logic 0,1…1,0 logic for goodness sake.That is why atheistic science is slowly giving up on ever coming up with anything meaningful.It’s just all BABBLE Frank.Key cr*p in you get cr*p out as they say.

I would suggest that our brains are magnetic computers as well.Read up on it.

We think we are clever and we haven’t even reached this technology level yet.We are only just developing such computers.

I don’t babble Frank.

I would suggest that everything vibrates in the cosmos including consciousness.

You babble more than anyone else in this forum, Jasper.

But I do thank you for sharing your amateur blind guesses about the reality of human biology. I get quite a kick out of it. I'm sure others find it as cute as I do.

Nothing defines babbling better than a babbler babbling on about not being a babbler.

You accurately calls 'em as we sees 'em.

Bullsh*t Frank you are just unaware.

I don’t guess Frank…

If you think so bobsal or maybe you are just unaware….

No, I'm aware. You babble. A lot.