1
   

Why does Bush always send underlings to announce bad news?

 
 
Reply Tue 16 Aug, 2005 09:09 am
Has anyone else noticed that whenever there is bad news to announce, Bush always sends an underling out to make the annoucement. This time it was Condi Rice. Chicken hawk Bush doesn't even have the guts to announce bad news himself. What a prick! ---BBB

Iraqis Fail to Meet Constitution Deadline
By BASSEM MROUE, Associated Press Writer
Mon Aug 15, 7:34 PM ET

Iraqi leaders failed to meet a key deadline Monday to finish a new constitution, stalling over the same fundamental issues of power-sharing ?- including federalism, oil wealth and Islam's impact on women ?- that have bedeviled the country since Saddam Hussein's ouster.

Just 20 minutes before midnight, parliament voted to give negotiators another seven days, until Aug. 22, to try to draft the charter. The delay was a strong rebuff of the Bush administration's insistence that the deadline be met, even if some issues were unresolved, to maintain political momentum and blunt Iraq's deadly insurgency.

"We should not be hasty regarding the issues and the constitution should not be born crippled," said Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a Shiite, after the parliament session, which lasted a bare 15 minutes. "We are keen to have an early constitution, but the constitution should be completed in all of its items."

Al-Jaafari's statement came after an apparent deal late Monday on all but two key issues fell apart, according to several Shiite politicians.

The Shiites said the unresolved issues were women's rights, which is inextricably tied to Islam's role, and the right of Kurds to eventually secede from the country. But al-Jaafari said the key stumbling blocks were distribution of oil wealth and federalism, another, broader way of stating the Kurdish autonomy issue.

The confusion over outstanding issues ?- as well as negotiators' seeming inability to agree even on what they disagreed on ?- left unclear whether they will now reopen talks on all issues or just focus on a few.

U.S. officials downplayed the significance of the delay, and President Bush expressed confidence the Iraqis would reach consensus.

"I applaud the heroic efforts of Iraqi negotiators and appreciate their work to resolve remaining issues through continued negotiation and dialogue," he said in a statement. "Their efforts are a tribute to democracy and an example that difficult problems can be solved peacefully through debate, negotiation and compromise."

Nevertheless, the last-minute decision to postpone the deadline raised serious questions about the ability of Iraq's varied factions to make the necessary political compromises.

Television cameras were at the ready as parliament convened late Monday to consider any final, undecided issues and debate the entire charter. In a sign of Washington's close involvement, the American ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, was in the hall as parliament gathered. He wore a broad grin, apparently anticipating a vote on the charter.

As the session was about to start, electricity went out for about three minutes. When lights came back on, Khalilzad, al-Jaafari and others were surrounded by their bodyguards ?- an indication of the persistent threat of violence in Iraq.

Afterward, the U.S. ambassador blamed the setback partly on a three-day sandstorm that prevented delegates from meeting. "Iraqi leaders determined that a seven-day extension was needed to resolve remaining issues and to fine tune the language of the draft to avoid errors," he said. "I have no doubt that Iraq will have a good draft constitution completed in the coming days."

Even if negotiators produce a constitution in the next week, the wide divide over issues such as federalism, oil revenues and Islam's role are unlikely to dissipate. The majority Shiites also have a stake in federalism, hoping to create an autonomous region in the south as Kurds have in the north ?- both areas rich in oil. Minority Sunni Arabs oppose federalism, while showing some willingness to compromise.

Saleh al-Mutlaq, a Sunni member of the constitutional committee, told state-run Iraqiya television: "We still have our reservations regarding federalism, but that was not the only reason for the postponement, because there were big points of disagreements, not between us and others but between the others themselves."

Sunni Arabs are believed to be the biggest supporters of the insurgency, causing Washington to push hard for their demands to be addressed to lure them from the fighting.

The impasse left open the possibility that Iraq ?- a patchwork of Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis put together as a nation by the British after World War I ?- could still tumble into a civil war.

It also blunted the rapid progress toward democracy that Iraqis have accomplished so far, from the vote last Jan. 30 that installed the nation's first elected government to the efforts to share power among the Shiite majority, the strong Kurdish group and the smaller, disgruntled Sunni Arab faction.

If agreement on a constitution is reached, however, Iraqis will vote around Oct. 15 to accept or reject the charter, leading to more elections in December for the country's first new government under the new constitution.

Kurdish leaders were the ones to propose the deadline extension, and their demands in recent weeks have stymied consensus.

The Kurds had suggested language giving them eight years within a unified Iraq and after that the right to secede. Shiites told them they should decide now whether they want to stay within Iraq.

The issue of women's rights was just as complicated and undecided, falling under Shiite demands that Islam be the main source of legislation. Under Islamic law, or sharia, women might not receive the same share of inheritance and cannot initiate divorce.

In contrast, officials had said that agreements had been reached previously on issues such as distribution of the country's oil revenues, the country's name and the issue of whether Iraqis could hold dual citizenship.

But Jaafari said oil revenues were still up for grabs. And even the name was unclear: Officials have said they were deciding on either the Republic of Iraq or Federal Republic of Iraq, but had ruled out the idea of putting any Islamic reference in the country's name.
-----------------------------------------------

Associated Press reporters Qassim Abdul-Zahra, Sameer N. Yacoub and Omar Sinan contributed to this report.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 465 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Aug, 2005 09:23 am
The answer to your question is simple BBB. Bush doesn't have any balls. He's an idiot without a spine.

This whole notion of a 'constitution' is a sham. Mad
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Aug, 2005 09:27 am
That's the advantage of being the big cheese. You can delegate the crap that would make you look bad to some one else. You come out smelling like roses. Why else would you need half the underlings you have?
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Aug, 2005 09:33 am
Linkat wrote:
That's the advantage of being the big cheese. You can delegate the crap that would make you look bad to some one else. You come out smelling like roses.


Bush is a big cheese alright. A big lump of Limburger cheese.

If I let myself think too long about Bush being our president and the crap he's doing, I get so mad I can hardly stand it. What makes me even madder are my fellow Americans who buy his load of crap and support (enable) him. How blind can they be?????
Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Aug, 2005 10:41 am
Impasse on Iraqi charter hinges on key issues
Impasse on Iraqi charter hinges on key issues
Reuters
8/16/05

BAGHDAD ?- The 71-member panel drafting Iraq's post-Saddam Hussein constitution failed to meet a Monday deadline to complete the charter. Main points of dispute:

•Federalism. The Kurds have been the most vocal in arguing for a strongly decentralized federal state that would safeguard their gains in three provinces in northern Iraq. Sunni Arabs, who see themselves as the historical glue for Iraqi unity, have resisted federalism as a ruse for eventual Kurdish independence. Shiite religious leaders have wavered on such decentralization. Some favor the idea that Shiite regions of the south form a "federated region."

•Islam. Secularists, U.S. officials and a host of liberal lobby groups, the most prominent of which have been female activists, are fighting to water down references to Islam in defining the new Iraq.

Shiite clerics had originally pushed for Iraq to be named an "Islamic republic," like Shiite Iran, with Islamic law ?- presumably Shiite for Shiites and Sunni for Sunnis, though this was not spelled out ?- specified as the sole source of law.

If Islam is the sole source, rather than a source, of law, the parliament or local government could enact laws or regulations that deny women equal inheritance rights, restrict their rights in divorce cases or impose strict dress codes.

•Resources. Sunnis are keen for central government in Baghdad to control the country's oil revenue. Iraq's reserves are located around Basra in the south and Kirkuk in the north ?- another reason Shiites and Kurds favor federalism.

Sunnis could be left in the middle with a state bereft of resources.

•Kirkuk. Since Iraqi Kurdistan is already an autonomous region, the drafting committee is faced with deciding where the borders of its three provinces are and what proportion of their revenue can be retained for local use without passing through the central government in Baghdad.

The oil city of Kirkuk, just outside the present-day Kurdistan region, is an emotional issue.

Kurds consider it their ancestral capital and resent the forced settlement of Arabs during Saddam's rule. Arabs claim it is an Arab city. Turkish-speaking ethnic Turkmen argue it is theirs.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Aug, 2005 05:20 am
Only someone with a sense of leadership as opposed to, "I'm the boss, get yer arse out there and do it", would do it themselves. That's the answer to the question.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why does Bush always send underlings to announce bad news?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/16/2026 at 04:11:36