@maxdancona,
A one-sided argument doesn't (necessarily) make the argument wrong.
A one-sided solution doesn't (necessarily) make the solution wrong.
There are times when bi-partisan is simply not feasible for all sorts of reasons.
Yes, I believe that if more people vote in every single election, that the democrats would by and large do better than the republicans.
But, being that we are a democracy, that would be wonderful thing to see happen.
So, anything that makes voting more accessible and easier to do in free and fair elections is a beautiful thing.
1. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
the closure or relocation of polling stations that had served predominantly African American or minority voters, forcing them to travel long distances or to wait in long lines to cast their ballots?
2. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
the elimination or reduction of early voting period?
3. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
the restrictions or outright bans on voter registration drives?
4. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
large-scale purges of voter rolls (ostensibly to remove voters whose addresses could not be verified) and voter caging, a related tactic in which a political party sends non-forwardable mass mailings to registered voters who are unlikely to support the party’s candidate or agenda and then uses any returned mailings as a basis for challenging the voters’ registration or right to vote?
5. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
restrictive voting laws, that enables Republicans to win office or to stay in power in jurisdictions where less than a majority of likely voters supports their candidate or agenda?
6. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
bills that criminalizes the act of giving food or water to people waiting for hours in long voting lines?
7. Is it fundamentally wrong in stopping
bills from giving partisan state legislatures significant control over election administration while reducing the traditional administrative authorities of the executive branch and of state and local (county or municipal) election boards?
For example, Georgia’s omnibus “Election Integrity Act of 2021,” signed into law in March, included provisions that replaced the secretary of state as chair of the State Election Board with an appointee chosen by the legislature, effectively giving the legislature control of the board.
Democratic leaders and other critics of the law asserted that this provision enabled the legislature to take effective control of local decision making on matters such as polling station locations and closures, challenges to voters’ eligibility, and, crucially, the certification of election results. Similar bills relating to election administration were introduced in several other state legislatures and enacted into law in some states.