@vikorr,
vikorr wrote:Came to this conclusion a while back. Everytime I tried to argue ethics/right/wrong/perspectives based on principles with him - he would:
- ignore discussing principle to focus on anything other than the underlying principle
That's a lie. I always address core principles head on.
vikorr wrote:- would ignore the substance that disagrees with him to focus on minutae
What you refer to here is when I point out fatal flaws in your position.
vikorr wrote:(tactics for those with weak logic)
Wrong. Pointing out fatal flaws in opposing positions is a tactic of those with strong logic.
You are not capable of logic, and you should not presume to comment about it.
vikorr wrote:- focus on race
That's a lie. I only focus on race when race is already the subject of discussion.
vikorr wrote:- and use hyperbole / demonisation
That's another lie. Everything I've said is entirely factual. That's why you have to lie about me instead of addressing the subject of the thread.
vikorr wrote:He still does it now, as you noticed, producing substanceless waffle.
That's another lie, and a hypocritical one at that. You are the person here who is producing substanceless waffle.
You are not capable of addressing the subject of the thread, so instead you spout endless lies about me.
vikorr wrote:But when people point it out to him - he calls them liars.
You are lying about me. It is proper that your lies are denounced as such.
