The Derek Chauvin Trial

Look. I know that thinking isn't really your thing, but your complaint is pretty silly.

My posts that denounce your racist behavior, actively quote your racist behavior as part of their denunciation.

You do realise that you claim you always back up your claims...and a poster is asking you to do so here, by providing an example from my posts of racism (which is your claim)...and you can't do it, right?

Like a lot of your posts...you engage in a LOT of dissembling when you are asked to do something you can't do. But the end result is the same...you don't do it because you can't do it.

And as a previous poster noted...you provide empty conversation, without showing the ability to reason. A lot of chanting empty slogans, but when asked for your reasoning...you fall to pieces.

Actually I provided two examples of your anti-white racism.

Your appalling treatment of Amy Cooper would be a third example, but I don't have the time tonight to go dig that up.

Two examples is plenty though. No need for a third.

Conversations with you are empty because you always drag them down to your level. That is nothing to do with me. I have excellent conversations with people who are actually intelligent.

Do you mean where:
- I listed a large number of grounds where she could have seen Mr Cooper was being reasonable?; and
- none of those grounds relied on race; and
- you ignored all those grounds (saying only that they were irrelevant, which is a judgement - and judgements require reasoning, but you refused to provide any reasoning when asked)

The only one ignoring anything based on principle is yourself. The only person unable to argue based on principle (though your claim - you won't), is you....you are left with resorting to accusations of racism...which is just a reflecting on your own flaws.

Right and wrong exist regardless of race, and can only be based on principle. You consistently ignore any considerations / principles whenever it doesn't favour your favoured race. You then refuse to engage in reasoned discussion (ie. provide your reasons)....and again, this is a reflection on your flaws, rather than mine.

Your false accusations of your own racism are pretty dishonorable.

...and again...lacking in any attempt at reasoning.

Empty.

Like I said, you always drag conversations down to your own level.

Repeat after me:
- "Right & Wrong exist regardless of race"
- "the only way to identify right & wrong, is on principles and context"
- "a judgement must be able to be reasoned"

This would be amusing if it wasn't so pathetic. I can't imagine how much difficulty he has in his everyday life. He must have been teased mercilessly in school. There are foundations that are devoted to helping the developmentally disadvantaged, I wish he could be directed to one of those orgs for help. The can work wonders.

I'd have to agree. But in a way, I find it really sad. Lot's of people have problems - the sad part starts when they no longer want to grow.

I see you're joining in with the dummies to spout some lies and name-calling at your intellectual betters.

Not that I expected you'd say anything intelligent or anything. But your last post here just seems to really capture how you are the exact opposite of an intelligent conversationalist.

Lies and name-calling are all that you are capable of.

It's really rich for someone with your substandard IQ to falsely accuse smart people of being developmentally disadvantaged.

When you are not running around spouting lies and name-calling at people, the only thing that you are capable of contributing to a conversation is "Duh, I don't understand what you just said."

I'd like to see some examples of your claims of 'name-calling' against you. You've now accused me, glitterbag and vikorr of this, but I haven't seen one instance. Please provide one for each of us and, failing that, please provide your definition of name-calling.

Your request is pretty disingenuous. Obviously falsely accusing someone of being developmentally disabled is name-calling. Are you going to pretend that it isn't?

You can see glitterbag and vikorr make such false accusations against me just a few posts above. Did you somehow miss the previous few posts?

Your own name-calling was when you referred to me as "oral-boy".

"oral-boy" was obviously a typo. I was typing oralloy and it autocorrected a few times (as it did right now) and I thought I had fixed it.

And who accused anyone of being developmentally disabled?

I still want to see the evidence.

It was not so obvious since glitterbag and others deliberately use that very term as name-calling.

But I accept your explanation that you didn't intend it.

If you want to see evidence of glitterbag and vikorr falsely accusing me of being developmentally disabled, just scroll up a few posts. It's their most recent posts in this thread.

But you accused me of name-calling you and I don't believe I have done that. That's really the evidence I would like to see. If you have the time, maybe you could point that out.

???

I did just point it out.

You just clarified that you didn't intend it as name-calling.

I just accepted your explanation.

He doesn’t like people and it too scared to go out the front door without being heavily armed.

He cannot provide one example of him taking the side of the black victim over the white perpetrator because it has never happened.

He accused Mame of “childish name calling” because of his limited vocabulary. That is the phrase he uses when people disagree with him in a jovial manner, it’s all he has, and due to his extremely limited vocabulary cannot come up with the right words.

As he lacks the wherewithal realise that he digs his heels in and repeats his moronic mantra ad nauseam.

I don’t know why anybody bothers talking to him, you don’t learn anything, he can’t learn anything, and he is totally repulsive.

I’ve not noticed any redeeming/positive attributes at all. Even Gungasnake had some sensible things to say about the legal system and capital punishment, but not him, there’s nothing. It’s like gazing into Satan’s uncleaned lavatory.

Now he’ll reply with, ‘No I’m not, you are,’ or something similarly erudite which I won't bother reading.

I haven’t the heart to scroll through all of the exhausting Oralloy angst to see, so I’ll just ask: Has anyone been following the news about the police beating and tasing a (black) man to death in Louisiana?

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/19/us/ronald-greene-video-louisiana-police-death/index.html