The Derek Chauvin Trial

I don't know how conservatives can talk about leftist and democrats going over the mark. That law is just insane.

Next the thing you know it will be legal to shoot protesters in the streets, what is the difference?

the right wing wrote:

Black Lives Matter wants Black people to be able to kill Police Officers

the left wing wrote:

The story reads like [the police] where planning to do this before they arrived.... an execution of someone they wanted to be rid of

Both the left-wing and the right-wing in America have gone nuts.

There has to be room for logical thought somewhere in the middle.

Other than longjon (I think that was the name), I'm inclined to agree.

Ok, I've read your post three times and it still doesn't make any sense,

It's Coldjoint. He is now posting as Longjon with numerous sockpuppets accounts.

He even posts in pink when he forgets

Bobsal didn't do any where near as much yet still got banned for years, but

and likes to point out the negative score of other non Nazi posters.
neo Nazis seem to be able to do whatever they want here with absolute impunity.

This from Shaun King on Facebook:
After 6 months of pilot testing here in NYC, the city just announced that ALL mental health calls in New York are being removed from the NYPD altogether.

It will take some time to implement this, but last year over 154,000 mental health calls went to the NYPD.

That's 421 calls a day that won't be going to the NYPD anymore.

That's less brutality.
That's thousands fewer arrests for people who actually need treatment.

Now, that funding and staffing should no longer be needed by the NYPD.

Move the funding they would've had for this over to social services.

This is all we mean when we say Defund the Police.

It made me sick how she was treated during and after the trial. When the verdict was announced she was hugged and treated like the victim before she was taken away.

I don't think she will. They appear to want to argue that she acted under an honest but mistaken belief that she was in her appartment (and therefore within her right to shoot him...I don't get that law, but it's a different country).

From what I read though, there is no reasonableness where she could argue 'honest' belief:
- there was a different door mat
- the furniture would be different to hers
- the furniture setup would be different to hers
- the guy was sitting on a couch (how many burglars do that?)
- the guy was in evening at home clothes
- the guy looked innocent (ie. not like a hardened criminal)
- the first reaction of a person whose home has been entered unlawfully is either a look of surprise or outrage (while criminals would be fear or hositility)
- the first words out of any surprised persons mouth is 'what are you doing / get out of my house / what the? / etc.

- she'd be trying to say she didn't find this very, very strange..and not at all at odds with her belief she was in her own appartment. I don't think anyone would buy that.
- she didn't ask him 'what are you doing in my appartment'

I'd be incredibly surprised if they managed to get the killing downgraded to manslaughter.

I doubt that you are capable of pointing out any falsehoods in Longjon's posts.

Depends on the state not the country - I cannot imagine in MA for instance that this would be within your right. Most states you cannot just shoot someone even in your own apartment - you would need to have your life endangered in order for it to be justifiable. So I still question this - a few states it is a more free for all - but most you do not have a right to shoot someone even if they broke into your home - unless like I said your life was in danger.

On the good side, people won't get tasered for mere non-compliance, which seems to happen a bit over there.

You only think this way because of your anti-white racism.

Non-racists realize that people can make honest mistakes. And they accept that honest mistakes are not in any way malice.

I was.

That is incorrect. It is possible for an honest mistake to be unreasonable.