Deep flaws in Mathemathical thinking.

Piggy is reluctant to get involving in too much dispute about math.
Imagine a circle together with its tangent. When we use the circle to approximate the tangent, the radius of the circle r → ∞. Sounds that infinity really exists.

Among the mathematical methods, which one can help solve problems in physics effectively, piggy will use it. Black cat vs white cat, which cat can catch mouse, it’ll be a good cat.

Perhaps even another 1 million years passes, no one can create a model to illustrate what nature is doing exactly. Forever, touchy and feely, both in math and physics.
…………………………………
By the way, what do you mean by “present your own beefs”? Piggy has only “pork”…

Imagine qualitative infinity between phenomena. How would everything not be totally alien to everything?

As for quantitative infinity what does it matter that you can plug a function of +1 if such function thus not translate to new information after you exhausted all phenomena in Reality?

So which is it, either you have Qualitative irrational Infinity, in which case you have to explain how everything is not alien and irrational towards everything else, or, if you don't, where does quantity stops representing qualia/phenomena/sets, of real things, such that you are left only with a fractal pattern repeat, of whatever sets of phenomena already exist which are finite?

To put it more succinctly what is the value function of quantity up to infinity without quality matching it? If quantity is counting repeated patterns of information it is not informing much...

In a finite circle you can go round and round ad infinity but that thus not mean you are really in an actual infinity. In Maths we have the same problem.
As soon as you get into a fractal pattern you get infinity but what is its actual use?

The moderate approach:

The debate on both sides of the fence regarding Infinity: