Donald Trump’s Tulsa rally fizzles as seats go empty.

Only to someone with a sense of fairness and equality.

Art , when the artist retains rights, is PROPERTY. Springsteen made the point several times when Bush or Christie, or Trump and even one of the more honorable politicos, like John McCain, tried to adopt some of Springsteen's "workmans songs" for their campaigns and Bruce told em all to go **** themselves and just get yer own music."I decide who can license it"


Andy Wyeth, after he sold a major Wyeth piece, would retain righst for prints and signed limited editions. Its PROPERTY. Wyeth was a GOPer although, I dont thkn Jamie followed along.

I advise ignoring them and let them whine. Mr. Trump should play whatever music he wants to play.

If they want to charge a reasonable royalty for the use of their songs, sure. He should pay that.

But no one should let a deranged leftist try to tell him what music he can or can't play.

That said, how about some technical death metal? Something from Death's "Symbolic" sounds about right.

I'm not understanding why you promote breaking the law and stealing musical rights.

Read all you can about property law , then come back all full of yourself.(I guarantee youll change your whining)

Wrong again. No whining on my part.

I don't propose stealing anything. I said that he should pay a reasonable royalty for using the song.

so you dont whine when youre discovered to be dead wrong again

And that's the exact issue, he doesn't pay, he doesn't even ask.

It's stealing intellectual property and you're ok with that.

Pretty dishonest and dishonorable by the Trump Administration.

Because Ivanka steals the designs for her fashion lines.

How does my statement that he should pay reasonable royalties equate to being OK with not paying royalties???

You cannot find any untrue statements in any of my posts.

Because, if you had read the article instead of barking out insanity, you'd know:

So in other words you were wrong to say that I thought it was OK for him to skip paying reasonable royalties.

I in fact think that he should pay reasonable royalties.

Considering the fact he hasn't and continues to steal intellectual property of others without remuneration, you are the one in the wrong.

Now, if he HAD paid, even without permission, that would at least assuage the issue. However, you still support a person who steals. That's pretty dishonest and dishonorable. And wrong.

That is incorrect. I am not wrong to say he should pay reasonable royalties.

Saying that he should pay reasonable royalties is in no way support for not paying reasonable royalties.

Then why do you support someone who is dishonorable and steals?

I support the President because he protects our gun rights and appoints justices who protect our gun rights.

Joe Biden means to violate our gun rights for no reason and appoint justices who will allow our gun rights to be violated for no reason.

He just doesn't get it. He'd argue that any store has the right to deny service to anyone, but not Tom Petty. He's a perfect little hypocrite.

You can always tell a progressive has no facts or logic when they make up phony arguments instead of addressing what people actually say.