1
   

Hardline Mayor Wins Iran Presidential Race

 
 
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:17 am
Is this another example of the failure of our intelligence agencies and the Bush administration to accurately assess what is going on in Iran? Recall the administration pundits and spin doctors drum beating for the theory that Iran's young people are in revolt against the hardliners and, thus, will get rid of the people we don't like?

Unless the election was fixed via corruption and fraud, the people have once again proved the US wrong.

BBB

Hardline Mayor Wins Iran Presidential Race
By KATHY GANNON, Associated Press Writer
Sat Jun 25, 1:56 AM ET

The hardline Tehran mayor steamrolled over one of Iran's best-known statesman to win the presidency Saturday in a landslide election victory that cements conservative control over the nation's political leadership.

The outcome capped a stunning upset by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who many reformers fear will take Iran back to the restrictions imposed after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The Interior Ministry gave Ahmadinejad 62.2 percent of the vote over his more moderate rival, Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, who had nearly 35.3 percent. The ministry posted a notice in its headquarters declaring Ahmadinejad the winner of Friday's runoff. The rest of the ballots were deemed invalid.

The figures were based on more than 90 percent of the estimated 26 million votes cast, or nearly 55 percent of Iran's about 47 million eligible voters. In last week's first round of the presidential election, the turnout was close to 63 percent.

The victory gives conservatives control of Iran's two highest elected offices ?- the presidency and parliament ?- and gives a freer hand to the non-elected theocracy, which holds the final word on all important policies.

Clerics led by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei have true power in Iran, able to overrule elected officials. But reformers, who lost parliament in elections last year, had been hoping to retain some hand in government to preserve the greater social freedoms they've been able to win, such as looser dress codes, more mixing between the sexes and openings to the West.

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Joanne Moore indicated the result would not change the U.S. view of Iran, and what it considered to be a fundamentally flawed election that refused to accept scores of candidates, particularly women.

"With the conclusion of the elections in Iran, we have seen nothing that sways us from our view that Iran is out of step with the rest of the region in the currents of freedom and liberty that have been so apparent in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon," Moore said.

Ahmadinejad supporters will go to mosques to hold prayers and "thank God for this great victory," said his campaign manager Ali Akbar Javanfekr. But he said no street celebrations are planned.

The streets of Tehran were quiet before dawn. State television announced the results in its dawn bulletin, but there were no immediate outdoor celebrations.

Ahmadinejad is expected to start consultations soon on selecting his Cabinet. People will watch to see if he chooses clerics such as Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, a firebrand who has been mooted for the Culture Ministry ?- a post that controls the arts, publications and the cinema.

Ahmadinejad, the 49-year-old mayor of the capital, campaigned as a champion of the poor, a message that resonated with voters in a country where some estimates put unemployment as high as 30 percent. He struck the image of a simple working man against Rafsanjani, a wealthy member of the country's ruling elite.

"The real nuclear bomb that Iran has is its unemployed young people," said Ali Pourassad, after casting his vote for Ahmadinejad at a polling station set up in the courtyard of a mosque in the middle-class south of Tehran. "If nothing is done to create jobs for our young people, we will have an explosion on the streets."

But Ahmadinejad also vowed to return Iran to the principles of the Islamic Revolution more than a quarter-century ago. Such comments and reports about his inner circle of supporters ?- members of the Revolutionary Guard, the vigilantes who enforce public dress codes and some of the most hard-line clerics in Iran's theocracy ?- frightened Iran's reformers.

Ahmadinejad (pronounced "Aah-MA-dee-ni-JAHD") had not been expected even to make the runoff. But he squeaked ahead of his rivals into the No. 2 spot in last week's first-round vote. There were accusations that Revolutionary Guards and vigilantes intimidated voters to sway the vote in his favor.

Going into the first round, the 70-year-old Rafsanjani had been considered by far the favorite. But he was battered, placing first with only 21 percent in that round.

During Friday's voting, the reformist-led Interior Ministry reported "interference" at some Tehran polling stations. A ministry worker who was at a polling station reminding officials to watch for violations was arrested after he got in an argument with representatives of one of the two candidates, ministry spokesman Jahanbakhsh Khanjani said.

An Interior Ministry observers' group reported 300 complaints of violations in Tehran, said group leader Ibrahim Razini.

In the eyes of most, Rafsanjani ?- who was president from 1989-97 ?- represented the status quo. Backers felt confident he would continue the many social changes introduced by outgoing President Mohammad Khatami, including youth-supported freedoms such as dating, music, and colorful headscarves for women.

Rafsanjani now appears to be facing his political grave. He was humbled in 2000 when he failed to win a seat in parliament. He may retain his seat on the Expediency Council, which mediates between parliament and the ruling clerics, but he now casts the shadow of a two-time loser.

Ahmadinejad's surprising strength alarmed moderates and business groups at home and was watched with concern by international officials. Ahmadinejad would likely be a tough negotiating partner in Iran's talks with Europe over its nuclear program, which the United States contends aims to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran says the program aims only for producing energy.

He has criticized Iran's current negotiators as making too many concessions to Europe ?- particularly in freezing the uranium enrichment program ?- and he was expected to put Iran's nuclear program into the hands of some avowed anti-Western clerics.

The pragmatic Rafsanjani has appeared more willing to negotiate on the nuclear program. But a Foreign Ministry spokesman Friday underlined that the suspension is temporary and that enrichment will eventually be restarted no matter who wins the election.

But for many Iranians, the biggest issue was an economy that has languished despite Iran's oil and gas riches. Iran's official unemployment rate is 16 percent, but unofficially it is closer to 30 percent ?- and the country has to create 800,000 jobs a year just to stand still. In the fall, another million young people are expected to enter the work force.

Ahmadinejad, the son of a blacksmith, presented himself as the humble alternative to Rafsanjani, whose family runs a large business empire. He has promised Iran's underclass higher wages, more development funds for rural areas, expanded health insurance and more social benefits for women.

"Every vote you cast is a bullet in the hearts" of the United States, said Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, head of the Guardian Council and considered a leading supporter of Ahmadinejad.

"What they (Western countries) have is not democracy, but rule of trickery. It's parties and capitalists who get the vote of the people in their own favor to fill their pockets," he told worshippers at Friday prayers.
---------------------------------------

Associated Press correspondents Brian Murphy and Ali Akbar Dareini contributed to this report from Tehran.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 504 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 12:00 pm
Re: Hardline Mayor Wins Iran Presidential Race
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Unless the election was fixed via corruption and fraud, the people have once again proved the US wrong.

I would say you are grossly wrong there.

(Gawd, can any of you Americans ever leave your pro- or anti-Bush agenda at home when observing something some place else in the world? Pulease?! <cuts short by now traditional nimh rant>)

Anywho, this was what I posted in the "Democratisation in the Middle East" thread about the elections - I hadnt found any thread on the elections yet, despite the rather eye-catching first round a week ago. Might as well copy it here now that there is one. It was two posts actually, but I'll merge 'em.

----------------------------------------------------------

Lash wrote:
Pull up a chair!!Hardliner wins election in Iran...

Was this a legitimate candidate...or is he a figurehead for the powers that be?

What do you think about it?

Well, it's certainly a surprise Shocked.

It was already a big surprise when he reached the run-off; everyone was betting on an ample Rafsanjani lead with perhaps reformist Moin (or Moeen) coming in second - but Moin ended fifth, instead. Despite a high turnout, which had been predicted to benefit reformists.

I havent read about the run-off yet, but regarding the first round there were complaints of fraud. It was considered very suspicious that the Guardian Council had published an opinion poll that, unlike any other, already had Ahmadinezhad in second place, and even more suspicious that the Council published partial results the day after the elections showing him in second place when the Ministry of the Interior's numbers still had him third.

But the result could also have reflected the alienation of voters who want real change, with dissidents like Noble Prize winner Shirin Ebadi calling for a boycott.

For one, because the spectacle of free elections served to cloak the fact that the President thus elected will be nothing but a figurehead. When Khatami was first elected as reformist President in 1997 with such a surprising massive majority, mostly thanks to the young and women, he won a position that still had considerable clout. However, already then the office was secondary to the authority of the Guardian Council and Supreme Leader Khamenei. And as Khatami's government and the Guardian Council kept clashing and undoing each other's decisions and actions, the Council used its overriding power to whittle away ever more of the President's authorities, making Khatami ever more impotent - and the population, in turn, disillusioned in Khatami; two strikes in one.

By now, the office is thus a rather empty one, so the elections were something of a show - despite the wholly sincere enthusiasm and involvement of these or those voters.

A second reason for the boycott call was that, even if the counting of votes had been completely honest, the race was already rigged. After all, the Council of Guardians had controlled the nomination process. And out of over 1,000 initial registrations, it had only approved seven candidates. And a number of better-known reformists were barred, (deliberately?) leaving Moin, a rather uncharismatic figure, as the standard-bearer for true reformism.

Possibly the most progressive voters followed the boycott call (especially in the second round, which must have been depressingly uninspiring for them), yielding the victory to the conservative mayor of Teheran? Ahmadinezhad has a strong following in Teheran's poorest neighbourhoods, it seems, because of practical things he achieved for the city.

Anyhow, clever strategisms of the conservative Guardians there. In the short-term. In the long-term, it makes it more likely that the longing for change will take on more violent forms.

----------------------------------------

Turnout in the second round was only 47%, compared with 63% in the first round, which would confirm the above (Ahmadinezhad winning because reformist voters stayed home).

Still, on the bright side - this was the take of the Dutch news about the first round (I came here looking for a thread to post this in, in fact, and am kinda flabbergasted that there hasn't apparenly been any thread on the Iranian elections at all, only that stupid one about "War With Iran Has Begun"). And though the eventual results cast a pall on the analysis, I think it still makes an interesting and important point:

Quote:
Youngsters decide in Iran

NOTE ->16 June 2005
(translated from NOS Nieuws)

The era of the popular reformist Khatami is over. In Iran a President may only serve two terms and so there will be an other now. Khatami won twice with a landslide, but the last few years he's come under very much criticism.

He was said not to act strongly enough against the conservatives and he would avoid confrontation too much. Probably that's all true and it is also true that many of the changes that the reformers had wanted to implement have been blocked by conservative, often unelected bodies.

Nevertheless his influence has been enormous. Iran is a very different country than it was in 1997. He has started a process of liberalisation that can't be stopped.

He started making stronger ties with other countries. That too is an irreversible process. More should have been done, but if you look at the themes of the election campaign his influence is very clear.

Completely taboo

Four conservative candidates with a background in the ultra conservative Revolutionary Guard are competing with three reformers and a centrist cleric. All candidates have adopted themes that previously had been exclusively entertained by reformers.

Some of them, such as the expansion of personal freedoms and the opening of ties with the West, even with America, were until recently completely taboo.

Now even conservative candidate Larijani calls for religious modernity, when as head of state television he has mostly broadcast programmes about strict religious morality.

And Rafsanjani, who was an important advisor of the founder of the Islamic Republic Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, wants to give women more rights. All themes of the reformers.

Reformers

And what about the reformers? The most important candidate, Moin, has pulled the programme of the reformers even further on. He has even opened ties with forbidden organisations in Iran and he has dared to demand that the President should get more actual authorities.

At the moment, spiritual leader Khamanei always has the last word. If it's up to Moin, the President will really obtain the executive power. This is a very fraught issue in Iran, considering that the untouchability of the spiritual leader if part of the fundament of the state order.

Turnout

[..] Turnout will be important. On a low turnout conservatives in Iran tend to get more votes. But a low turnout would be bad for the legitimacy of the regime as a whole. Turnout in the countryside is expected to be higher than in the city.

[Among reformers and conservatives,] Rafsanjani is a little bit in between. He is mostly known for his practical behaviour. He sees his country as a huge bazar where everything can be negotiated.

The Iranian youth will play an important role. More than half of Iranians is younger than 25. In Iran you're allowed to vote when you're 15. That's why many candidates target youngsters in their campaigns. [..] They smile on poters and on TV they debate students, even if it's an orchestrated debate.

Corruption and murder

But many Iranians don't want any of the candidates and don't see the use of voting. They say they're all people who are part of the system.

Some are suspected of corruption and even involvement in murder, like Rafsanjani, although that was never proven. They won't vote, because they want to get rid of the system, period. [..]

Heated discussions

Everyone you speak freely speaks their mind. On the street you hear heated discussions about politics. Youths have waged campaign evening after evening, with music, mixed dancing [!], and hooting. All that would have been unheard of in the Iran of a few years ago.

With that, Khatami, who conquered the country with his smile, his humanity and his approachability, has put an unerasable stamp on the country, even if he is not getting the credits from everyone for that now.


As said, with the final result in mind this take may now seem overly optimistic. But I think the point about Khatami's role, especially where it concens social and cultural, rather than political change, is only fair.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Hardline Mayor Wins Iran Presidential Race
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/18/2026 at 07:50:51