Facts can apparently be slanted but truth is ever peskier.
Both are founding documents that curtail the authority of our republic/democracy.
The burden of proof is yours.
Prove that the latter either negates or builds upon the other.
I would like to hear your dissertation on how the Constitution negates the DOI or how the DOI has no relevance in regards to our government.
Let's hear it.
haha you say DOI is unbinding that is hilarious!
Unlike the other founding documents, the Declaration of Independence is not legally binding, but it is powerful.
You mean the constitution is legally binding when our president has defied it after swearing to uphold it, our supreme court judges mock it with citizens united and corporate personhood?
And corporations are not even required to swear allegiance to it.
Facts... really pesky things.
"The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another
, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
I guess you could call that unbinding. But shhh! Don't tell the British it is not "legally binding".