1
   

"Is is possible . . ?"

 
 
Reply Sat 21 May, 2005 12:09 pm
Is is possible to create riches without making some else worse off?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 545 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
djbt
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 May, 2005 04:12 pm
If you define riches in terms of possesions which improve your quality of life, yes.
If you define riches in terms of possesions held in relation by yourself against possensions not held by yourself, then no.
0 Replies
 
Marquis de Carabas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 May, 2005 04:52 pm
If two people living in different climates successfully share their houses as holiday homes with the other, have they not both become richer?

That is an example of a simple principle. All involved becomes richer through the increased efficiency of any usage of available resources.

Likewise non-physical riches, such as digital copies of music, can be possessed by any number of people.

Through increased technology we are also granted riches which did not even exist previously.

In answer to your question. Yes, we can become richer without others losing out. However there are limits to how much and in what ways we can do so.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2005 05:59 am
We can't become richer without others losing out. No matter what. But that is not to say that if you make a million someone will starve. That million wouldn't have ended up somewhere else were you not to make it. But you made it, so the other guy who was trying didn't. He's worse off, but now I think you'll agree that that's not your problem. Competition is key.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2005 09:10 am
the finite resources of this planet must be shared equitably for all to 'succeed'; not to mention the entire system of sharing needs to be overhauled.

['ownership' is based on 'faith', and all such things are vestiges of a distant, now meaningless, primitive past.]
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2005 10:57 am
Yes, you can create riches without making someone else worse off, by producing something new using your own labor and resources and by fair trade.

The problem is that it is easier to acquire wealth by under-compensating other people for their labor and property under a system that allows a few people to monopolize resources (land, hunting/fishing rights, minerals, taxes/tithes) for their own benefit.

If resources are limited, one person's over-use of them seems inconsequential but eventually deprives everyone (the tragedy of the Commons) such as deforestation, overfishing, hunting species to extinction, and pollution.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "Is is possible . . ?"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 06:40:10