@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:
No - they have a sign on the door as you walk into Target --- it says hiring - starting at $13/hour. If you saw some of the people working in target (nothing against them) you might think otherwise - however - she is doing customer service so yeah I can see that.
The pretty stuff is for those clothes stores - but funny how you mention it. There is a new store in the next town over. They have one size - it is for really small girls (like my daughter - she wears a double 0). So one of her friends applied there - and they asked for her social media account because the manager needs it to look at a few pictures - if he decides she has the look he will hire her.
My daughter was thinking of applying there until she heard that - she thought it was creepy so she didn't apply. Her friend did get the job - she thought it was because she is blond (not anything else to qualify her).
I can see how she would prefer customer service at Target. Target is still, imo, the prettier cousin of Walmart. The two stores are otherwise pretty similar, but I think more aesthetically-minded people, women especially, prefer Target even when Walmart items might be a little more durable.
Anyway, this discussion has deviated from the purpose of the thread, which is to question Sanders' idea that higher wages in society is better for the economy and people overall.
Generally, the automotive-consumer culture is what's causing the problems with climate and unsustainability, so it would make sense for everyone to make and spend less, and give up driving, use transit or ride a bicycle instead.
So when Sanders and/or other Dems are arguing in favor of higher wages and more growth, they're really arguing against the kinds of social-economic cultural reforms that would put the US on track for climate reform and sustainability.