PS Ms Hughes is once again showing ignorance of the topic. Darwins "Origins..." had absolutely nothing to do with humans. He later wrote a compromise book on "The Descent of Man ("left out in the title of that book was the code line that he used for evolution, which was descent with modification. If he didnt chicken out he would have added it)What mention Darwin made of man, was as a species and he made a reference that Dr Spencer will, no doubt shine better light upon the aspect of the descent of the anthropoids and man, since man and the higher apes are closer akin than the higher apes are with those of the lower orders
In "The Origin"..., the word "Races"
"was used as representative of phenotypic expression that most organisms display. She, and you for just cutting and pasting, are complete idiots.For those of us who dont have our own well worn copy of "THE ORIGIN", I have, pro bono, gone and found a link to the entire book , as well as his other later works and his 6th edition which, have some subtle changes (Ive been told by a Darwin scholar friend of mine-I jus take his word, guys like setanta may get some historical contextual crap out of the way Darwin was bouyed up somewhat in the second ed, perhaps due to Huxleys help, I dont know). ANYWAY, without further adoo here is the complete , unabridged version of Charles Darwins
ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION,orTHE PRESERVATION OF FAVOURABLE RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFETHEWHOLE DAMN BOOK