Discreet wrote:I try to be whatever the other person is not. I enjoy arguments that i agree on but often times i love even more the challenge of arguing against somethign that everyone agrees on. For example i could argue the the mclaren f1 is a car worth owning and im sure people would follow me. But what would be more fun is to argue that a pinto is a better car and try to convince people why. Im not sure if this is good or not though
This potentially can be a good thing.
I think you and I have this in common.
Thats funny, we might both be arguing this stuff, and both of us are standing up for the side we don't believe in. And we are debating each other. So we actually are both of our respective opposites! I am pretending I disagree with you, but actually I agree with your point of view. You are doing the same. We are arguing each other's cases. Something like that. That is hilarious.
Good lawyers are supposedly trained so that they can win either side of the same case.
Lets say a guy is on trial for murder. Lawyer can convict him, or get him off. All the facts of the case are exactly the same. Good attorney could win eiher side of the case. Scary.
Perhaps you should look into that profession. It would be right up your alley.
***
Not that I would know (I better stop now or some here will figure out what I do for a living and every bit of credibility{not much} I had will be gone forever.