1
   

Labeling Countries

 
 
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 08:59 pm
I never understood why we use the term 1st 2nd and third world countries. First of all is there certain criteria to be labeled on of the above. I think the phrase 2nd world countries was started by capitolists when discussing communism. All the large communist countries were considered 2nd world countries for politcal proganda. If a country such as Brazil has a huge spread between wealthy and poor how is it ranked. Is it based on GDP or on living conditions in the country. If anyone knows anything on this topic please post
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 595 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
fredjones
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 01:18 am
I have heard in the past that the old USSR had a first world military/space program with a third world economy. The average people suffer, while the leader lives in luxury. (sigh) I'll never understand people.

I think that it's just convention. Certainly diplomats do not refer to poorer countries as 'third world' because that would be insulting. Countries that are not technologically advanced, or socially tolerant tend to be viewed as third world. Just the way people label it, I suspect.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 01:37 am
"The economically underdeveloped countries of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America, considered as an entity with common characteristics, such as poverty, high birthrates, and economic dependence on the advanced countries. The French demographer Alfred Sauvy coined the expression ("tiers monde" in French) in 1952 by analogy with the "third estate," the commoners of France before and during the French Revolution-as opposed to priests and nobles, comprising the first and second estates respectively. Like the third estate, wrote Sauvy, the third world is nothing, and it "wants to be something." The term therefore implies that the third world is exploited, much as the third estate was exploited, and that, like the third estate its destiny is a revolutionary one. It conveys as well a second idea, also discussed by Sauvy, that of non-alignment, for the third world belongs neither to the industrialized capitalist world nor to the industrialized Communist bloc. The expression third world was used at the 1955 conference of Afro-Asian countries held in Bandung, Indonesia. In 1956 a group of social scientists associated with Sauvy's National Institute of Demographic Studies, in Paris, published a book called Le Tiers-Monde. Three years later, the French economist Francois Perroux launched a new journal, on problems of underdevelopment, with the same title. By the end of the 1950's the term was frequently employed in the French media to refer to the underdeveloped countries of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America"

Source
0 Replies
 
fredjones
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 01:57 am
Hmm.. very interesting read, Francis.
"...its destiny is a revolutionary one."
I wonder if that means their destiny is internal revolt, or revolt against the 'first world' countries?

I had no idea that there was such a precise definition.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 04:02 am
I think that this explains it nicely. A map of the world, with the countries differentiated by category is included:

Quote:
Four Worlds
After World War II the world split into two large geopolitical blocs and spheres of influence with contrary views on government and the politically correct society:
1 - The bloc of democratic-industrial countries within the American influence sphere, the "First World".
2 - The Eastern bloc of the communist-socialist states, the "Second World".
3 - The remaining three-quarters of the world's population, states not aligned with either bloc were regarded as the "Third World."
4 - The term "Fourth World", coined in the early 1970s by Shuswap Chief George Manuel, refers to widely unknown nations (cultural entities) of indigenous peoples, "First Nations" living within or across national state boundaries.


http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Labeling Countries
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 04:50:56