Reply
Sat 16 Apr, 2005 09:26 pm
The word evolution has been confused. Evolution: to evolve; change. That's simple enough. But then there's the hypothesis that every blade of grass, worm, human, dragon, etc., can all trace lineage back to a single cell organism. One microscopic organism transformed into every living thing on the planet. So that's the story. And then there's the mechanism by which it is proposed to have occurredÂ…'natural inclination' or something. Now, this ?'natural inclination' may also be referred to as micro-evolution, but is often referred to as just plain evolution. This is accurate. Studies have shown that finches have adapted to changes in their environment. These changes can be detected by measuring their beaks in millimeters. We can say these finches changed, evolved or succumbed to their natural inclination, whatever. Some even prefer to just call this evolution. That's fine, except the hypothesis mentioned earlier is often termed evolution as well. The current method for differentiating between the hypothesis and the mechanism is to use the following two compound words: macro-evolution and micro-evolution. This would seem to suffice, except that the micro and macro are often left off in a conversation and a person never knows which one is the subject of the discussion at hand. For future clarification it is imperative that we apply distinguishable terms for each.
The following terms are suitable when discussing micro-evolution, change, etc:
Evolution, Micro-evolution, Change, Adaptation, Prerogative and Natural Inclination.
The term to use when referring to the story that one single celled organism of unknown origin transformed into dogs, frogs and hogs, cats, bats and gnats, bees, trees and tea leaves, etc., will be:
Pocus-Cadabra.
There.
Now, if someone is talking to you regarding canines and the fact that coyotes, wolves, chows, beagles, hounds and St. Bernards can all trace their lineage to a single male and female canine, you may respond, ?'Oh, evolution.'
Likewise, if someone shares a tale with you about how these same canines, along with yourself and your whole family, the elephants in Africa, kangaroos in Australia and bats the world over can all trace their lineage back to a male and female fish that were cousins and contemporaries of the Coelacanth, you may reply with an acknowledging lift of your eyebrows, "Ah, Pocus-Cadabra."
Wow! A thread about evolution! This should be interesting.
Discussing the finer definitions of scientific terminology... now there is a new tact. I have never seen that before and I can't wait to see where this discussion leads!
And this whole "micro-evolution" vs. "macro-evolution" thing... I did a google on this, and didn't come up with anything... I hope you can elaborate.
I sure hope we can talk about the second law of thermodynamics as part of this discussion.
Oh... you put this in the Spirituality and Religion Forum...
Should this be in Science and Mathematics?
Quote:And this whole "micro-evolution" vs. "macro-evolution" thing... I did a google on this, and didn't come up with anything... I hope you can elaborate.
Maybe you whacked your google? I came up with 26,100. Are you sure you spelled it right? Again, maybe you whacked your google.
I was wondering about the Spirituality and Religion thing too. Yep, maybe Science and Mathematics, or Humour or even Waggery. Will M-W be contacted to input the new words?
If I am to work on a hypothesis I will have to wait until I see where this leads so I know what it is actually about.
Chiso, you have your terms mixed up.
Pocus-Cadabra is the word for the magical process that caused dogs, frogs and hogs, cats, bats and gnats, bees, trees and tea leaves to pop into existence out of nothing.
Natural inclination is the word for the means by which a species manages to remain the same in spite of millions of changes to their DNA that might otherwise cause them to evolve into something else over the course of a few million years.
Re: Distinguishable Terms
Dear Chiso,
No one who ever uses a phrase like "'natural inclination' or something" has any right to attempt to delineate everyone elses usage of the english language. Particularly when the term you're searching for is natural selection.
If you don't know what you're talking about, why should we listen to you? Please learn a bit more on the topic and then you can tell us what we can and can not say. Deal?
I realize the lack of science and mathematics in Pocus-Cadabra; I put it where it belongs.
Of course this is in the right place, as my signature line indicates.
He-e-e-y...You been readin' my notes?