4
   

How much "Biomass" is on Earth, and is it growing?

 
 
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 08:44 am
I'm not sure how anyone would measure this, but let's say that when the Earth first formed it was pretty much a molten rock with zero biomass on it (or a negilgible amount if you're thinking about amino acids from asteroids or such). Now of course, the Earth has lots of biomass. But how much? Do we measure this in tons, or in percentage of the total mass of the planet?

The other thing I'm wondering about is the rate of increase of Biomass. For example, did the biomass of the Earth shoot up from zero to a high percentage of its current state, and then level off for billions of years, or had it increased and steadily over time, or did it see a rapid increase at some point in biological history, like when life came onto land, or when multicellular organisms first evolved.

Anyone have any idea on any of this?

Thanks,
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 4 • Views: 4,753 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 09:00 am
I found this,which helps a little. But I was hoping for a bit more detail.

It looks like Biomass simply exploded when Earth recovered from the Oxygen transition, but the curve just keeps going up. Is there no end in sight? Is it still going up at the same rate?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 09:09 am
More dribs and drabs...

Quote:
rokaryotes, for example are the most successful and abundant organisms on Earth, in both numbers and biomass and still make up to 90% of the total weight of living things.


Source
0 Replies
 
neil
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 09:41 am
Unless we narrowly define biomass, it is still increasing, but perhaps slower than in the past. Is limestone biomass? coal? oil? Neil
0 Replies
 
Waldo2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 10:01 am
I believe that non-fossil is part of one definition, but several definitions can be found.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 10:09 am
Waldo_ wrote:
I believe that non-fossil is part of one definition, but several definitions can be found.


Yes, in the context of my question, I'm more interested in active, living, reproducing biomass, not simply organic material.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 10:38 am
The biomass of Earth is approximately 1851.7x10E9 metric tons.

from

http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/rants/simulation_errors.html
0 Replies
 
neil
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 01:33 pm
The interior of Earth may be cooling. Warming seems unlikely. So micro-organisms may be moving deeper into the crust increasing the biomass. The one degree C warming (and reduced ice) of the Arctic regions (the past 30 years) is likely increasing biomass. The latter may be the reason for negligible carbon dioxide increase. Neil
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Mar, 2005 05:35 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
The biomass of Earth is approximately 1851.7x10E9 metric tons.

http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/rants/simulation_errors.html


Yes. I saw this while Googling for info on the subject.

What percentage of the total Earth mass is that number?

But the main thing I'm interested in is the growth rate from zero to now. Is it steady, or goes it have bumps and glitches in it.

This relates slightly to the "complexity" question which was recently posted. One of the main challenges to "complexity" is that it's such a small portion of Biomass. So I was interested in a relationship between biomass growth and the various stages of life on the planet (oxygen bacteria, multi-cellular arrival, animal life, land based life, extinction events, etc). I was hoping to see some type of fluctuation in the biomass increase which might relate somehow to the various stages of complexity of life on the planet.
hackajim
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2011 07:52 pm
@rosborne979,
i dont think global biomass can change, because all of the big molecules in our body come from the earth, the iron and heavy things obviously were forged in an exploding star and bombarded to earth a long time ago... but they can be thought of as "from the earth" ... the only mass the earth 'gains' is from meteors/metorites/little stuff in space and big stuff in space, ... think of it like this, the sun isnt feeding mass onto the earth, its energy that the sun sends us and we convert it or change it.... when you burn gasoline in your car the earth doesnt lose or gain wieght... energy was converted without any mass getting lost. i think.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2011 08:47 pm
@hackajim,
I think you may have misunderstood the question
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 03:51 am
@hackajim,
Biomass means living organisms, not organic/carbon molecules.
0 Replies
 
jacksawyer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 May, 2012 01:51 pm
@rosborne979,
The mass of the earth is approximately 5.98x10E24.
So biomass as a fraction is approximately 3.1x10E-10, or 3 parts in 10 billion.
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 May, 2012 03:14 pm
@jacksawyer,
Where did you get those numbers?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How much "Biomass" is on Earth, and is it growing?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 02:07:38