1
   

Plants Can Fix Bad Genes

 
 
Reply Wed 23 Mar, 2005 12:55 pm
Top Stories - Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times
Plants Can Fix Bad Genes, Study Shows

Wed Mar 23, 7:55 AM ET


By Karen Kaplan Times Staff Writer

Upending prevailing genetic theory, a team of scientists at Purdue University has discovered a mechanism in plants that allows them to correct defective genes from their parents by tapping into an ancestral data bank of healthy genetic material.


In essence, the plants back up the evolutionary path and use past genes to restore traits that would otherwise be lost, according to a study published Tuesday in the online version of the journal Nature.

The finding proposes "an extraordinary view of inheritance," the scientists said in their paper.

The mechanism appears to be a way for self-fertilizing plants, which are more likely to suffer from the negative consequences of inbreeding, to maintain a healthy level of genetic diversity and increase their chances of survival.

It could also be a way for plants to adapt to changing environmental conditions by having a store of diverse traits at their disposal, the scientists said.

The proposal offers a radical addition to the widely embraced laws of Mendelian genetics, which date back to the mid-1800s. They hold that plants and animals inherit only two copies of a gene ?- one from each parent. If both copies were defective, a plant would have no ability to correct the error.

"This means that inheritance can happen more flexibly than we thought in the past," said Robert Pruitt, a molecular geneticist who co-authored the paper. "While Mendel's laws that we learned in high school are still fundamentally correct, they're not absolute."

If the newly discovered mechanism is also found to be at work in people, "it's possible that it will be an avenue for gene therapy to treat or cure diseases in both plants and animals," Pruitt said.

The Purdue scientists happened upon their discovery by accident. They were intending to study a deformed version of the Arabidopsis plant, a member of the mustard family.

Their particular variety produced flowers that were fused into tight balls, a consequence of the plants' having two defective copies of a gene dubbed "hothead."

Breeding the plants should produce only offspring that are also deformed. But the scientists were startled to see that 10% of the offspring produced normal flowers that radiated out from the center of a cluster.

They conducted a series of experiments that indicated the bright white flowers were not the result of accidental cross-pollination or other contact with normal seeds.

The plants "can recover DNA variants that have come from one of their great-grandparents, even if their immediate parent did not contain the variant," wrote molecular biologists Detlef Weigel and Gerd Jurgens in an accompanying article.

The researchers said the plants must contain a normal version of the hothead gene, although they searched the plants' genomes and were unable to find it.

That has led them to believe that the genetic information could be contained in the plant's RNA, a close cousin to DNA that is thought to be a less reliable vessel of genetic information.

Each of the steps necessary for RNA to modify the genes in DNA has already been demonstrated in other research, the scientists said.

In addition to Pruitt, the authors were Susan Lolle, Jennifer Victor and Jessica Young, all of the department of botany and plant pathology at Purdue.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 778 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Mar, 2005 06:40 pm
Two of these threads, Bob, you and rosborne. Fascinating stuff.... can't wait to see what the spin-off looks like.
0 Replies
 
bobsmythhawk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2005 02:04 am
Hi littlek:

It's interesting that some plants can morph to protect itself.

As the late Gottfried S. Fraenkel suggested, it is not a plant's primary metabolites (the substances it synthesizes that are essential for its growth and reproduction) that make it suitable or unsuitable as a source of food. Rather, the plant's suitability depends to a large degree on its secondary metabolites: metabolic compounds that are not involved in the common processes of life and that vary from plant to plant, helping to determine each plant's unique characteristics.

In 1971 the late Robert H. Whittaker and Paul P. Feeny of Cornell University added a new level of precision to Fraenkel's concept. They suggested that secondary metabolites produced by an individual of one species and able to affect the growth, health, population biology or behavior of another species should be called allelochemics. (Chemical ecologists now use the terms allelochemic and allelochemical interchangeably; I much prefer the latter term.) Among the many types of allelochemicals are attractants, repellents, allergenics and toxins. In this presentation, I shall discuss the allelochemicals employed by certain plants to defend themselves from predation by insects and various other herbivores.

The customary way to determine the defensive capacity of a higher plant's allelochemicals is to demonstrate their toxicity toward one or more of a variety of insects that have come to be accepted as standard reference species in evaluating biological toxicity. The usual approach is to incorporate the natural allelochemicals into an artificial diet that would normally sustain the insect. J. M. Erickson, then a student of Feeny's, and Feeny, working on the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes, modified this method to provide a more natural approach. Instead of creating an artificial diet for their insects, they introduced a plant allelochemical into a plant that is part of the butterflies' natural diet.

Adult P. polyxenes avoid plants of the group Cruciferae (the mustards) which produce such allelochemicals as sinigrin, a compound that contains allylisothiocyanate, a toxic constituent. On the other hand, the butterflies forage avidly among the Umbelliferae, which include such plants as celery. Erickson and Feeny reared P. polyxenes larvae on a diet of celery leaves that had been induced to take up sinigrin. The larvae fed, and their growth was markedly inhibited. Celery containing a level of sinigrin equivalent to the level found in cruciferous vegetation was lethal to all the tested larvae. These experiments demonstrated that toxic allelochemicals could render an otherwise suitable host plant unacceptable to an insect pest.

David A. Jones and his colleagues at the University of Hull developed another experimental verification of the effectiveness of toxic allelochemicals. They studied bird's-foot trefoil (Lotus) and white clover (Trifolium), species that are capable of producing cyanogenic glycosides, compounds made of sugars bound to cyanide complexes, and storing them in their leaves. If two particular enzymes are present when the plant's leaves are damaged, the cyanogenic glycosides are broken down to release the cyanide complex, from which free cyanide is eventually liberated. Bird's-foot trefoil and white clover are "polymorphic" for cyanogenesis: only some individual plants can produce both the cyanogenic glycosides and the enzymes required to liberate cyanide. Hence not all plants of each species can defend themselves by means of cyanogenic glycosides. Jones exploited this peculiar property to determine how effective a stratagem cyanogenesis is for the plant population within his region of study. He examined a map, published in 1954 by Hunor Daday, then at the Welsh Plant Breeding Station in Aberystwyth, showing the geographic distribution of plants able to synthesize both cyanogenic glycosides and the appropriate enzymes and thus able to produce free cyanide.

http://www.uky.edu/~garose/link100.htm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Plants Can Fix Bad Genes
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/29/2026 at 09:02:56